Bank of N.Y. Mellon Trust Co., Nat'l Ass'n v. Balash

Decision Date21 December 2017
Docket Number525290
Citation156 A.D.3d 1203,68 N.Y.S.3d 163
Parties The BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Formerly Known as The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as Successor to JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A., as Trustee, Respondent, v. Anna BALASH, Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

156 A.D.3d 1203
68 N.Y.S.3d 163

The BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Formerly Known as The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as Successor to JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A., as Trustee, Respondent,
v.
Anna BALASH, Appellant.

525290

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Calendar Date: November 20, 2017
Decided and Entered: December 21, 2017


68 N.Y.S.3d 164

Sipsas PC, Astoria (Ioannis P. Sipsas of counsel), for appellant.

Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP, New York City (Benjamin Noren of counsel), for respondent.

Before: McCarthy, J.P., Rose, Devine, Mulvey and Rumsey, JJ.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Mulvey, J.

Appeals (1) from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Nichols, J.), entered August 5, 2016 in Columbia County, which, among other things, granted plaintiff's motion for a judgment of foreclosure and sale, and (2) from an order of said court, entered January 25, 2017 in Columbia County, which denied defendant's motion to reargue and/or renew.

Plaintiff commenced this foreclosure action against defendant in July 2012. Defendant was served with the summons and complaint on August 1, 2012 and failed to either serve an answer or file a motion to dismiss the complaint. In November 2015, plaintiff moved for an order of reference based upon defendant's default. Defendant acknowledged receipt of that motion and filed an "affidavit in opposition" in which she declared, among other things, that she was "never properly served" and that plaintiff lacked standing. Supreme Court granted plaintiff's motion, finding that defendant had not answered, moved or appeared with respect to the complaint. In May 2016, plaintiff moved for final judgment of foreclosure and sale. Defendant filed an affidavit in opposition and plaintiff replied. The court granted plaintiff's motion, in an order entered in August 2016, and ordered, among other things, that the property be sold at a public auction. In October 2016, defendant moved for leave to renew and reargue, asserting again that she was not properly served with the summons and complaint and that plaintiff lacked standing. Supreme Court denied...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co. v. Ford
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • 21 d4 Maio d4 2020
    ...in the action or to vacate the [2016] order of reference" founded upon that default ( Bank of N.Y. Mellon Trust Co., N.A. v. Balash, 156 A.D.3d 1203, 1204, 68 N.Y.S.3d 163 [2017] ; compare U.S. Bank N.A. v. Gilchrist, 172 A.D.3d 1425, 1428, 102 N.Y.S.3d 625 [2019] ), defendants "are deemed ......
  • Ditech Fin. LLC v. Levine
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • 31 d4 Outubro d4 2019
    ...of a motion to reargue," defendants' appeal from the June 2018 order must be dismissed ( Bank of N.Y. Mellon Trust Co., N.A. v. Balash , 156 A.D.3d 1203, 1204, 68 N.Y.S.3d 163 [2017] ; see CPLR 5701[a][2] [viii] ; Hyman v. Pierce , 145 A.D.3d 1224, 1225, 43 N.Y.S.3d 571 [2016] ). As for the......
  • Gmat Legal Title Trust 2014-1, U.S. Bank, Nat'l Ass'n v. Wood
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • 20 d4 Junho d4 2019
    ...to reargue, we note that no appeal lies from the denial of a motion to reargue (see Bank of N.Y. Mellon Trust Co., N.A. v. Balash, 156 A.D.3d 1203, 1204, 68 N.Y.S.3d 163 [2017] ; Wells Fargo, N.A. v. Levin, 101 AD3d 1519, 1520, 958 N.Y.S.2d 227 [2012], lv dismissed 21 N.Y.3d 887, 965 N.Y.S.......
  • Williams v. Annucci
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • 19 d4 Setembro d4 2019
    ...of such a motion (see Budin v. Davis, 172 A.D.3d 1676, 1679, 101 N.Y.S.3d 487 [2019] ; Bank of N.Y. Mellon Trust Co., N.A. v. Balash, 156 A.D.3d 1203, 1204, 68 N.Y.S.3d 163 [2017] ). Moreover, as noted by Supreme Court, said motion is untimely as it was brought in October 2015, more than 30......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT