Bank of New York v. Vega Technology Usa, LLC
| Decision Date | 23 May 2005 |
| Docket Number | 2004-00320. |
| Citation | 18 A.D.3d 678,2005 NY Slip Op 04165,794 N.Y.S.2d 922 |
| Parties | BANK OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. VEGA TECHNOLOGY USA, LLC, et al., Defendants, and DINA FORRAS, Respondent. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Ordered that the order, as amended, is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion is granted.
The plaintiff made a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]) by demonstrating the existence of the promissory note executed by the defendant Dina Forras, the unconditional terms of repayment, and Forras's default thereunder (see East N.Y. Sav. Bank v Baccaray, 214 AD2d 601 [1995]; Beer Sheva Realty Corp. v Ponjnitayapanu, 214 AD2d 352 [1995]; Silber v Muschel, 190 AD2d 727 [1993]). Forras failed to meet her burden of demonstrating, by admissible evidence, the existence of a triable issue of fact (see Zuckerman v City of New York, supra at 560; Ihmels v Kahn, 126 AD2d 701 [1987]; Kruger Pulp & Paper Sales v Intact Containers, 100 AD2d 894, 895 [1984]).
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Jin Sheng He v. Chang
...v. Rovner, 35 A.D.3d 576, 825 N.Y.S.2d 766; Famolaro v. Crest Offset, Inc., 24 A.D.3d 604, 807 N.Y.S.2d 387; Bank of N.Y. v. Vega Tech. USA, LLC, 18 A.D.3d 678, 794 N.Y.S.2d 922). Here, the plaintiff met his prima facie burden of establishing his entitlement to judgment as a matter of law b......
-
Washington Mut. Bank v. Valencia
...35 A.D.3d 576, 576, 825 N.Y.S.2d 766; Famolaro v. Crest Offset, Inc., 24 A.D.3d 604, 605, 807 N.Y.S.2d 387; Bank of N.Y. v. Vega Tech. USA, LLC, 18 A.D.3d 678, 679, 794 N.Y.S.2d 922). The defendant raised the defense that he was authorized to rescind the underlying transaction, and in fact ......
-
White Rose, Inc. v. Newtown Food Mkt., Inc.
...140 [2d Dept.2008]; Quest Commercial, LLC v. Rovner, 35 A.D.3d 576, 825 N.Y.S.2d 766 [2d Dept.2006]; Bank of N.Y. v. Vega Tech. USA, LLC, 18 A.D.3d 678, 794 N.Y.S.2d 922 [2d Dept.2005] ). In opposition, the defendant failed to raise a triable issue of fact with respect to a bona fide defens......
-
N.Y. Cmty. Bank v. Fessler
...878 N.Y.S.2d 394; Premium Assignment Corp. v. Utopia Home Care, Inc., 58 A.D.3d 709, 709, 871 N.Y.S.2d 724; Bank of N.Y. v. Vega Tech. USA, LLC, 18 A.D.3d 678, 679, 794 N.Y.S.2d 922; Cardella v. Giancola, 297 A.D.2d 618, 619, 747 N.Y.S.2d 31; Gregorio v. Gregorio, 234 A.D.2d 512, 651 N.Y.S.......