Bank of Perry v. Cooke
Decision Date | 07 September 1895 |
Citation | 1895 OK 59,41 P. 628,3 Okla. 534 |
Parties | BANK OF PERRY v. E. H. COOKE et al. |
Court | Oklahoma Supreme Court |
Error from the District Court of P County.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE.
On the 9th day of February, 1894, Brogan & Jackson, a firm composed of J. M. Brogan and Junius E. Jackson, at the city of Perry, in P county, executed a certain chattel mortgage to the Bank of Perry for the sum of $ 425, due in ten days after date, and secured the same on the entire stock of groceries, flour, feed, etc., of the said firm. Said mortgage was, on the 20th day of February, 1894, filed in the office of the register of deeds of said county at 4:30 o'clock P. M.
On the 10th day of February, 1894, J.
E. Jackson made, executed and delivered to the Bank of Perry, Perry, O. T., a certain chattel mortgage on all of the stock of groceries, tobacco, etc., of the said Jackson, to secure the sum of $ 225, due in thirty days after date, said mortgage being filed for record on the 20th day of February, 1894, at 4:30 P. M.
On the 9th day of February, 1894, Brogan & Jackson were partners, doing a general merchandise business. On the 10th day of February, 1894, the said firm dissolved partnership, J. E. Jackson assuming control of the business.
On the 20th day of February, 1894, J. E. Jackson made, executed and delivered to E. H. Cooke, a certain chattel mortgage on the entire stock of goods of the said Jackson, to secure the sum of $ 700, due on demand, said mortgage being filed for record in the office of the register of deeds of said P county, on the 20th day of February, 1894, at 5 o'clock P. M., said mortgage being subject to said mortgages to the Bank of Perry.
(At 4 o'clock P. M. on the 20th day of February, 1894, the plaintiff in error took possession of the stock of goods in question, under the mortgages above set out.)
On the same day, Nix, Halsell & Co., Henry Flock and Reid, Murdock & Co., levied upon the stock of goods in question, under an order of attachment, in the order named. Following these attachment creditors, E. H. Cooke filed his chattel mortgage on said stock, and Dale & Nessly, Armour Packing Co. and Symns Grocery Co. followed with writs of attachment in the order named.
On the 11th day of June, 1894, a jury being waived, a trial was had before the court, and the court made the following findings of fact and conclusions of law:
FINDINGS OF FACT.
To continue reading
Request your trial- Bank of Perry v. Cooke
-
Hoppe Hardware Co. v. Bain
...as a matter of law, irrespective of the question as to whether any fraudulent intent did in fact exist." ¶15 And in Bank of Perry v. Cooke et al., 3 Okla. 534, 41 P. 628, the court said: "It does not matter whether such agreement is oral or in writing, contained within the mortgage or witho......
-
Turk v. Kramer
...the mortgage are reviewed, and the rule announced in Little Co. v. Burnham, Hanna, Munger & Co., supra, is followed. Bank of Perry v. Cooke et al., 3 Okla. 534, 41 P. 628; Ranney Alton Mer. Co. v. Watson, 10 Okla. 675, 65 P. 98; Godfrey et al. v. Hutchinson Wholesale Gro. Co., 12 Okla. 459,......
-
Jackson v. Kincaid
...of the same in the usual course of trade, and convert the proceeds to his own use, was before this court in the case of Bank of Perry v. Cooke, 3 Okla. 534, 41 P. 628, and there the rule for this Territory was announced in terms too positive for uncertainty, and too direct for evasion that:......