Bank v. Galt Group Inc.

Decision Date17 May 2011
Citation2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 04208,923 N.Y.S.2d 643,84 A.D.3d 1028
PartiesJPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., respondent,v.GALT GROUP, INC., doing business as Enhance Face & Body, et al., appellants.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Edward I. Yatkowsky, White Plains, N.Y., for appellants.Helfand & Helfand, New York, N.Y. (Aaron Weissberg of counsel), for respondent.REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P., PETER B. SKELOS, ANITA R. FLORIO, and LEONARD B. AUSTIN, JJ.

In an action to recover on a promissory note and unconditional personal guaranties, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Murphy, J.), entered March 17, 2010, which granted the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on the complaint and dismissing the defendants' affirmative defenses and counterclaims.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant Bonnie Eskow–Hagen is the president of the defendant Galt Group, Inc., doing business as Enhance Face & Body (hereinafter Galt). On October 8, 2003, Galt entered into an agreement with the plaintiff, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (hereinafter Chase), for a United States Small Business Administration loan (hereinafter the SBA Loan), pursuant to which Galt borrowed $400,000 for the purpose of purchasing, renovating, and operating a day spa in Hartsdale. Eskow–Hagen and her husband, the defendant Karl G. Hagen, both signed personal guaranties in connection with the loan. The day spa was forced to close in January 2008. Galt defaulted on the SBA Loan that month, and Chase commenced this action against Galt, Eskow–Hagen, and Hagen (hereinafter collectively the defendants) shortly thereafter.

Chase and the defendants entered into a forbearance agreement on April 7, 2008, pursuant to which the defendants agreed to make certain payments, and Chase agreed to forbear in the prosecution of this action. In a letter dated July 13, 2009, Chase informed the defendants that they had not made any forbearance payments since February 19, 2009, and advised them to serve an answer to the complaint. The defendants thereafter served an answer dated September 8, 2009.

Chase moved for summary judgment on the complaint and dismissing the affirmative defenses and counterclaims set forth in the answer, submitting, in support of the motion, inter alia, the relevant promissory notes and agreements. In opposition, the defendants submitted a series of e-mails which, they argued, demonstrated that they had entered into yet another agreement with Chase, by which Chase agreed to forbear from prosecuting this action while the defendants were given an apparently unlimited time to obtain a refinancing loan to pay off or pay down the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
13 cases
  • High Tides Llc v. Demichele
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • October 25, 2011
    ... ... is to be afforded a liberal construction ( see CPLR 3026; EBC I, Inc. v. Goldman, Sachs & Co., 5 N.Y.3d 11, 19, 799 N.Y.S.2d 170, 832 N.E.2d ... Brokers, 139 A.D.2d 691, 691, 527 N.Y.S.2d 446; National Westminster Bank v. Weksel, 124 A.D.2d 144, 149, 511 N.Y.S.2d 626). As an initial matter, ... v. Pyramid Mgt. Group, Inc., 45 A.D.3d 1447, 1448, 845 N.Y.S.2d 664; [931 N.Y.S.2d 382] ... ...
  • Cadena v. Turner Constr. Co.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • August 4, 2021
    ...sufficient to require a trial. Opposing papers must "...raise genuine factual issues" (JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Gait Group, Inc., 84 A.D.3d 1028, 1029, 923 N.Y.S.2d 643 [2d Dep't. 2011], quoting Badische Bank v. Ronel Systems. Inc., 36 A.D.2d 763, 321 N.Y.S.2d 320 [2d Dep't. 1971]; Zuc......
  • In the Matter of State v. (anonymous)
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • May 17, 2011
    ... ... Kingsbridge Hgts. Care Ctr., Inc., 28 A.D.3d 465, 466, 813 N.Y.S.2d 191). Here, a review of the record ... ...
  • Bank of N.Y. Mellon v. Celestin
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • August 22, 2018
    ... ... (hereinafter ABC) and, as security, gave a mortgage to Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., as nominee for ABC, encumbering certain 83 N.Y.S.3d 168 real property. Both the note and the ... v. Galt Group, Inc., 84 A.D.3d 1028, 1029, 923 N.Y.S.2d 643 ; Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v. Williams, 62 ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT