Bankers Trust Co. of California, N.A. v. Weidner, 97-195

Decision Date28 February 1997
Docket NumberNo. 97-195,97-195
Citation688 So.2d 453
Parties22 Fla. L. Weekly D541 BANKERS TRUST COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, N.A., etc., Petitioner, v. John William WEIDNER, III, etc., et al, Respondent.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Robert W. Lee and Vivian Miller of Smith & Hiatt, P.A., Ft. Lauderdale, for Petitioner.

No Appearance for Respondents.

HARRIS, Judge.

Bankers Trust Co. of California, N.A. successfully obtained a summary judgment of foreclosure of the property involved in this action. A foreclosure sale was set for December 19, 1996. There is no question that the summary judgment was properly entered. The mortgagor, however, died on December 3, 1996 leaving two children. Her father moved to be appointed guardian of the minor child and petitioned the court to stay the foreclosure sale for at least 90 days. The court went him one better and granted the stay indefinitely. Bankers Trust seeks certiorari; we grant it and reverse.

The sole reason stated for the stay is that the guardian needs "to see if the assets of the minor child can be preserved by sale of the homestead, rather than loss of the homestead by foreclosure." There are no allegations that the property value exceeds the amount of the judgment nor is there any requirement that any security be given for the stay or that the property be insured or even maintained by the guardian during the period of the stay. The court has stayed indefinitely the enforcement of a mortgage merely on the offhand chance that there may be equity in the property in excess of the debt. This petition and the time to reschedule a new sale has already given the guardian in excess of 60 days to make that determination. That is time enough.

We grant the writ of certiorari and direct the trial court to reschedule the foreclosure sale.

COBB and GOSHORN, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • LR5A-JV v. Little House, LLC
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • December 10, 2010
    ...LR5A relies on U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. Tadmore, 23 So.3d 822 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009), Bankers Trust Co. of California, N.A. v. Weidner, 688 So.2d 453 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997), and First Nationwide Savings v. Thomas, 513 So.2d 804 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987), to support its contention that under section 4......
  • Fichera v. State, 96-2102
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • February 28, 1997
2 books & journal articles
  • Chapter 14-3 Rule 1.540 and Motions to Vacate Judgment
    • United States
    • Full Court Press Florida Foreclosure Law 2020 Title Chapter 14 Post-Judgment Motion Practice
    • Invalid date
    ...Werner, 232 So. 2d 252, 256 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970). See also Fla. Stat. § 95.11(5)(h).[157] Bankers Trust Co. of California, N.A. v. Weidner, 688 So. 2d 453, 454 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997); Republic Fed. Bank, N.A. v. Doyle, 19 So. 3d 1053, 1054 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009).[158] Moforis v. Moforis, 977 So. 2d ......
  • Chapter 14-3 Rule 1.540 and Motions to Vacate Judgment
    • United States
    • Full Court Press Florida Foreclosure Law 2022 Chapter 14 Post-Judgment Motion Practice
    • Invalid date
    ...Werner, 232 So. 2d 252, 256 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970). See also Fla. Stat. § 95.11(5)(h).[198] Bankers Trust Co. of California, N.A. v. Weidner, 688 So. 2d 453, 454 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997); Republic Fed. Bank, N.A. v. Doyle, 19 So. 3d 1053, 1054 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009).[199] Quest Systems, LLC, as Successo......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT