Bannan v. City of Saginaw
Decision Date | 06 January 1983 |
Docket Number | Docket Nos. 57322,57323,57324 and 57325 |
Citation | 328 N.W.2d 35,120 Mich.App. 307 |
Parties | James H. BANNAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY OF SAGINAW, a municipal corporation, Defendant-Appellant. Gerald W. GIFFIN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY OF SAGINAW, a municipal corporation, Defendant-Appellant. George J. KAUFMAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY OF SAGINAW, a municipal corporation, Defendant-Appellant. Raymond J. HALE, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY OF SAGINAW, a municipal corporation, Defendant-Appellant. |
Court | Court of Appeal of Michigan — District of US |
van Benschoten, Hurlburt & van Benschoten, P.C. by Lawrence A. Hurlburt, Saginaw, for plaintiffs-appellees.
Braun, Kendrick Finkbeiner, Schafer & Murphy by Bruce L. Dalrymple, Saginaw, for defendant-appellant.
Before ALLEN, P.J. and CYNAR and MARTIN, * JJ.
Defendant, City of Saginaw, appeals as of right the trial court's four judgments entered April 7, 1981, ordering the city to reimburse all four plaintiffs, with interest, the sums the city deducted from their disability retirement pensions. The judgments further enjoined defendant from deducting the amount of each plaintiff's future workers' compensation benefits from their pension benefits. The principal issue on appeal is the applicability of Sec. 129 of the City of Saginaw's Ordinance D, which mandates the offset of worker's compensation benefits from all retirement benefits.
Plaintiffs are former City of Saginaw fire fighters who retired due to disabilities. Plaintiff Bannan was a Saginaw fire fighter for 24 years until February 28, 1967. The Bureau of Worker's Disability Compensation awarded Bannan weekly benefits of $69, or $3,588 annually, from that date. When Bannan became 55 years old, the city began paying him a duty disability pension pursuant to defendant's Ordinance D. Bannan was entitled to an annual duty disability pension of $3,479. However, pursuant to an offset provision in Ordinance D, defendant withheld and continues to withhold all of Bannan's pension benefits.
Plaintiff Giffin stopped working as a fire fighter on October 25, 1973, after approximately 24 years. On October 29, 1973, defendant voluntarily commenced paying Giffin workers' compensation benefits pursuant to the Worker's Disability Compensation Act of 1969 (WDCA), M.C.L. Sec. 418.101 et seq.; M.S.A. Sec. 17.237(101) et seq., in the amount of $98 per week or $5,096 annually. On November 1, 1973, Giffin retired. He was then entitled to an annual disability pension of $6,041.62. On October 31, 1974, Giffin turned 55. The defendant did deduct and continues to deduct Giffin's $5,096 workers' compensation benefits from his pension benefits.
Prior to that date, Giffin twice filed for a duty disability retirement. Instead, defendant's Board of Trustees of the Saginaw Policemen's and Firemen's Retirement System (Board) found Giffin eligible for a nonduty disability pension on November 1, 1973, based upon its medical director's report which indicated Giffin suffered from several chronic illnesses but did not indicate the illnesses were work related. On November 26, 1974, Giffin asked the Board to reconsider his application for duty disability benefits. On December 11, 1974, defendant sent Giffin a letter noticing a meeting of the Board on December 17, 1974. At that meeting, the Board noted Giffin's request and said:
Plaintiff Raymond Hale also discontinued working for defendant after almost 25 years on March 8, 1974. The following day, defendant voluntarily commenced paying Hale workers' disability benefits pursuant to the WDCA in the amount of $106 per week or $5,512 annually. On September 14, 1974, defendant's Board granted Hale's application for a duty disability pension in the amount of $8,035.30 annually. Defendant's Board deducted and continues to deduct $5,512 from Hale's duty disability pension annually.
Plaintiff Kaufman discontinued working as a Saginaw fire fighter on September 20, 1973, after 35 years of service. On November 21, 1974, the City voluntarily commenced paying Kaufman workers' compensation in the amount of $104 weekly or $5,408 annually. On June 6, 1973, Kaufman applied for a duty disability pension but defendant's Board denied the same. Instead, Kaufman became eligible on his last day of work to a regular retirement pension of $10,408.84. Kaufman turned 55 years old in 1971. The defendant's Board deducted and continues to deduct the $5,408 annual workers' compensation benefits from Kaufman's pension benefits.
The plaintiffs filed their suits against the city of various dates in 1978, seeking reimbursement of the amounts deducted from their pensions and a court order enjoining the defendant from further deducting the amounts of their workers' compensation benefits from their disability pensions. Moreover, plaintiffs Giffin and Kaufman each sought a writ of mandamus ordering the defendant's Board to find him eligible for a duty disability pension as opposed to a nonduty disability pension or a regular pension.
Defendant's Ordinance D, Saginaw Administrative Code, Chapter 5, which contains the provisions governing the city's Policemen and Firemen Retirement System, requires the offset of workers' compensation benefits from all retirement benefits:
Section 102.1(h) of that ordinance defines retirant as, "any member who retires with a pension payable by the retirement system". Section 102.1(u) also defines voluntary retirement age:
" 'Voluntary retirement age' means age 55 years for the firemen and age 52 years for the policemen: Provided, that in the case of an original member, voluntary retirement age means age 55 years for firemen and age 52 years for policemen or the age at which he acquires 25 years of credited service, whichever occurs first."
All Saginaw fire fighters must contribute to the pension/retirement system:
Saginaw fire fighters do not contribute to the federal city's mandatory pension program. The city also contributes to the retirement fund annually based on a fluctuating annual actuarial evaluation of the system's means of support.
Sections 121-122 of Ordinance D provide for nonduty disability pensions or retirements. Such disabilities are not work related. Section 122 provides:
Sections 123-124 of Ordinance D provide for duty disability pensions. Such disabilities are work related. Section 123 provides in part:
(Emphasis added.)
Section 124 provides in part:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Crowe v. City of Detroit
...of the Saginaw plan are discussed in Hatton and in Bannan v. Saginaw, 420 Mich. 376, 362 N.W.2d 668 (1984), aff'g Bannan v. Saginaw, 120 Mich.App. 307, 328 N.W.2d 35 (1982). Furthermore, without much in the way of meaningful analysis, Hatton disagreed with the prior decision in Johnson, sup......
-
IN RE v. Pangori & Sons, Inc.
...of a statute, the provision which more specifically addresses an issue should be given greater weight. Bannan v. City of Saginaw, 120 Mich.App. 307, 319, 328 N.W.2d 35 (1982). 3 It is not readily apparent from the Supreme Court's opinion when the payments on the performance bond were made. ......
-
People v. Benda
...provision and a general provision encompass the same subject matter, the specific provision is controlling. Bannan v. Saginaw, 120 Mich.App. 307, 319-320, 328 N.W.2d 35 (1982), aff'd, 420 Mich. 376, 362 N.W.2d 668 (1984). Second, the adoption of the prosecutor's interpretation would render ......
-
Oliver v. Department of State Police, Docket No. 71089
...between the judicial and executive branches. See Bischoff v. Wayne County, 320 Mich. 376, 31 N.W.2d 798 (1948); Bannan v. City of Saginaw, 120 Mich.App. 307, 328 N.W.2d 35 (1982), lv. gtd. 418 Mich. 880 (1983), and Brownstown Twp. v. Wayne County, 68 Mich.App. 244, 242 N.W.2d 538 (1976), lv......