Baptiste v. State
| Decision Date | 05 July 2007 |
| Docket Number | No. 3D05-2599.,3D05-2599. |
| Citation | 959 So.2d 815 |
| Parties | George BAPTISTE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Colleen Brady Ward, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Timothy R.M. Thomas, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before RAMIREZ and LAGOA, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.
The defendant's primary point on this appeal from a jury conviction for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon challenges the denial of his motion to suppress the firearm which he claims was unconstitutionally secured.
Baptiste was Terry-stopped by police after a then-anonymous informant dialed 911 to report that a person who matched his description was "waving" a firearm in the vicinity. Immediately after the stop, the person who called came to the scene and, without giving his name, identified himself as the caller and Baptiste as the person he saw with a gun. A subsequent pat-down and search of Baptiste's person indeed revealed that he was carrying a nine-millimeter Taurus handgun. The defendant's argument is based on the fact that when Baptiste was first observed and stopped by the police, he was merely walking down the street and neither had a weapon in plain view or was apparently otherwise violating the law. Relying on Florida v. J.L., 529 U.S. 266, 120 S.Ct. 1375, 146 L.Ed.2d 254 (2000), the defendant contends that the original anonymous tip was insufficient to support the stop and subsequent seizure. We disagree.
In two vital respects, we distinguish J.L. from this case:
1. In the first place, the content of the original tip described not merely the easily falsified and otherwise unverifiable fact that the defendant was carrying a concealed firearm, as in J.L., but rather the quite obvious and extremely dangerous fact that a firearm was being openly displayed. In these circumstances, the "tip" itself rendered it reasonable for the officer to effect the stop necessary to inquire further.1 See United States v. Perkins, 363 F.3d 317, 321 (4th Cir.2004) (), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1056, 125 S.Ct. 867, 160 L.Ed.2d 781 (2005). But see United States v. Brown, 401 F.3d 588 (4th Cir.2005) ().
2. Again unlike J.L., the "anonymous tipster" who made the 911 call was transmogrified into a constitutionally reliable citizen informant when the caller—before the pat-down search and seizure of the gun—came to the scene and identified himself to the officers. See Chaney v. State, 956 So.2d 535 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007); Castella v. State, 2007 WL 1426880 (); Manning v. State, 957 So.2d 111 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007); Carattini v. State, 774 So.2d 927 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001); Milbin v. State, 792 So.2d 1272 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001); see also United States v. Heard, 367 F.3d 1275 (11th Cir.2004), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 913, 125 S.Ct. 235, 160 L.Ed.2d 194 (2004); United States v. Valentine, 232 F.3d 350 (3d Cir.2000), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 1014, 121 S.Ct. 1748, 149 L.Ed.2d 670 (2001); United States v. Holmes, 360 F.3d 1339 (D.C.Cir.2004), vacated and remanded on other grounds, 543 U.S. 1098, 125 S.Ct. 1046, 160 L.Ed.2d 992 (2005); United States v. Christmas, 222 F.3d 141 (4th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1098, 121 S.Ct. 830, 148 L.Ed.2d 712 (2001). See generally J.L., 529 U.S. at 274, 120 S.Ct. 1375 (Kennedy, J., concurring); State v. Maynard, 783 So.2d 226 (Fla.2001).
We find no merit in the other point presented for reversal.
Affirmed.
1. It is admitted that an otherwise justified Terry stop may, as in this case, be effected at gunpoint. See Carroll v. State, 636 So.2d 1316 (Fla.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 973, 115 S.Ct. 447, 130 L.Ed.2d 357 (1994); State v. Ruiz, 526 So.2d 170 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988), review denied, 534 So.2d 401 (Fla.1988), cert. denied, 488...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Baptiste v. State
...Respondent. LEWIS, J. Petitioner George Baptiste seeks review of the decision of the Third District Court of Appeal in Baptiste v. State, 959 So.2d 815 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007), asserting that it expressly and directly conflicts with a decision of the Second District Court of Appeal, Rivera v. St......
-
D.G. v. State
... ... First, there is no question of the assistant principal's plenary authority, with or without justification, to summon a student to her office. See J.D. v. State, 920 So.2d 117 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006). Second, Terry1 standards of reasonable or founded suspicion, see Baptiste v. State, 959 So.2d 815 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007), rather than the ordinary requirement of probable cause to justify a warrantless search apply in the supervisor-student-school setting. See New Jersey v. T.L.O., 469 U.S. 325, 333, 105 S.Ct. 733, 83 L.Ed.2d 720 (1985); C.G., 941 So.2d at 504. Third, and ... ...
-
Regalado v. State
...gun. The officer had not observed any crime take place. The trial court denied the motion to suppress relying on Baptiste v. State, 959 So.2d 815 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007) (Baptiste I), in which the Third District held that a stop was permissible based upon a tip that a firearm was being openly di......
-
R.B. v. State
... ... Id. (citing New Jersey v. T.L.O., 469 U.S. 325, 333, 105 S.Ct. 733, 83 L.Ed.2d 720 (1985)); Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968); Baptiste v. State, 959 So.2d 815 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007); C.G. v. State, 941 So.2d 503 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) ... The question of reasonable or founded suspicion is viewed from the standpoint of a reasonable officer with this ... 975 So.2d 548 ... officer's training and experience. See Cross v ... ...
-
Search and seizure
...the stop is proper. The appearance of the informant change him from an anonymous tipster into a citizen-informant. Baptiste v. State, 959 So. 2d 815 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007) LEO got a tip that a person was selling a jet ski and trailer on the side of the road, which violates a city ordinance. The......