Barbee v. Poston, 21677
| Decision Date | 22 March 1982 |
| Docket Number | No. 21677,21677 |
| Citation | 289 S.E.2d 649,277 S.C. 504 |
| Court | South Carolina Supreme Court |
| Parties | Dale Eugene BARBEE, Appellant, v. Cynthia W. POSTON and Heather Virginia Poston, Respondents. |
Thomas A. Givens, of McKinney & Harrelson, Rock Hill, for appellant.
Larry F. Grant, of Mack, Mack & Freeman, Fort Mill, for respondents.
Plaintiff-appellant, claiming to be the father, brought this action to establish parental rights to an illegitimate child. His complaint was dismissed as stating no cause of action entitling him to relief; and he has appealed on the following sole exception:
The lower court erred in finding for the respondent upon the respondent's motion to dismiss.
The foregoing exception fails to comply with Supreme Court Rule 4(6), Williams v. Regula, 266 S.C. 228, 222 S.E.2d 7, and is so deficient as to present no issue for review. The appeal is accordingly dismissed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
- Myrtle Beach Pipeline Corp. v. Emerson Elec. Co., No. 3:86-1796-21.
- Hartman v. Jensen's, Inc., 21676
-
Smith v. South Carolina Dept. of Social Services
...City Glass & Mirror, Inc., 274 S.C. 558, 266 S.E.2d 67 (1980); Williams v. Regula, 266 S.C. 228, 222 S.E.2d 7 (1976); Barbee v. Poston, 277 S.C. 504, 289 S.E.2d 649 (1982); Burris v. State, 278 S.C. 151, 293 S.E.2d 309 (1982). Being aware that the Supreme Court dismissed these cases under S......
-
Germain v. Nichol, 21846
...contain a complete assignment of error. See South Carolina Insurance Department v. Estrada, S.C. 287 S.E.2d 475 (1982); Barbee v. Poston, S.C. 289 S.E.2d 649 (1982). We dismiss these Appellant's remaining exception is to the effect that the evidence does not justify the award of actual dama......