Barber v. State
Citation | 288 S.E.2d 353,161 Ga.App. 435 |
Decision Date | 01 March 1982 |
Docket Number | No. 63116,63116 |
Court | United States Court of Appeals (Georgia) |
Parties | BARBER v. The STATE. |
Carl Greenberg, Susan L. Frank, Atlanta, for appellant.
Lewis R. Slaton, Dist. Atty., Joseph J. Drolet, Asst. Dist. Atty., Margaret V. Lines, Kenneth Marshall, Asst. Dist. Attys., Atlanta, for appellee.
Appellant was indicted and tried for two counts of motor vehicle theft, former Code Ann. § 26-1813, and one count of theft by taking. He was convicted of one of the counts of motor vehicle theft and of the theft by taking count. He appeals.
1. Appellant enumerates the general grounds as error. The evidence was sufficient to establish that appellant was in recent possession of the vehicle and the property alleged in the indictment. In the absence of a satisfactory explanation Warfle v. State, 157 Ga.App. 196(1), 276 S.E.2d 689 (1981).
2. Appellant enumerates as error the denial of his motion to sever the two motor vehicle theft counts for separate trial, urging that they were joined solely because they charged offenses of the same or similar character. See Wigley v. State, 140 Ga.App. 145, 230 S.E.2d 108 (1976). Even assuming without deciding that the erroneous failure to grant a severance as to two counts of a multicount indictment would be harmful when, as here, there is an acquittal as to one of the counts, (compare Davis v. State, 159 Ga.App. 356, 283 S.E.2d 286 (1981)), there is no reversible error in this case. It appears that the two motor vehicle theft counts were joined and tried on the theory that they evidenced Johnson v. State, 158 Ga.App. 398, 399, 280 S.E.2d 419 (1981). The trial court did not err in denying appellant's motion to sever. Davison v. State, 158 Ga.App. 549(1), 281 S.E.2d 305 (1981); Green v. State, 159 Ga.App. 28(1), 283 S.E.2d 19 (1981).
Judgment affirmed.
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Quick v. State
...theory that they evidenced 'a series of connected acts or constitut[ed] parts of a single scheme or plan.' [Cit.]" Barber v. State, 161 Ga.App. 435, 436, 288 S.E.2d 353. "[T]he trial judge has discretion concerning the severance of a trial when there is evidence of 'two or more offenses bas......