Barbot v. Mutual Reserve Fund Life Ass'n
Decision Date | 29 March 1897 |
Citation | 28 S.E. 498,100 Ga. 681 |
Parties | BARBOT v. MUTUAL RESERVE FUND LIFE ASS'N. |
Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
Syllabus by the Court.
1. A certificate of membership in a mutual benefit life association, which carries with it insurance on the life of the member, is taken and accepted under the terms and conditions of the charter, constitution, and by-laws of the association in force at the time of the issuance of the certificate, whether reference to the same is or is not made in the certificate. (a) When an application for membership in such association declares that the constitution and by-laws are to be made a part of the certificate, when issued, the certificate, constitution, and by-laws of the association constitute the contract between the member and the association. (b) In such a case, when the certificate has attached thereto an assessment rate table, showing, by amounts, the proportion of assessments which are to be made at ages from 15 to 65 years on each $1,000 insured, and the constitution and by-laws provide that, at stated intervals assessments shall be made by the governing authorities on the entire membership, for such sums as may be deemed sufficient to meet existing death claims, which shall be apportioned among the members according to age, the table attached to the certificate will be construed only to fix the ratio of payment by each member on the basis of age.
2. A resolution passed at a convention of the members held under the terms prescribed in the constitution and by-laws, which simply gives to the board of directors power to pay death claims from current receipts, which, under the constitution and by-laws, are applicable to another fund, while good as a by-law, is not mandatory, but merely suggestive of what might be done. Without additional words, such a grant of power leaves its exercise in the discretion of the board; and, when an assessment is made by the board, larger in amount than it would have been if such current receipts were so applied this assessment cannot be held illegal or excessive, under the terms of such resolution or by-law.
Error from city court of Richmond; W. F. Eve, Judge.
Action by Louis J. Barbot against the Mutual Reserve Fund Life Association. From an order sustaining a demurrer to the complaint, and dismissing the petition, plaintiff brings error. Affirmed.
F. W Capers, for plaintiff in error.
Fleming & Alexander, for defendant in error.
Louis J. Barbot filed in the city court of Richmond county his complaint against the Mutual Reserve Fund Life Association, a corporation duly incorporated under the laws of New York, and doing business in the state of Georgia and county of Richmond, in which he alleged that on the 31st day of July, 1882, the defendant made and entered with petitioner into the following policy contract, to wit:
Then follow various conditions which are immaterial to an adjudication of the questions raised, and in conclusion it is provided that the application for membership shall constitute a part of the certificate. Indorsed on the policy is the following:
(Image Omitted)
After setting out the certificate of membership and insurance, the material portions of which are copied above, Barbot further alleged: That he had complied with the terms of said contract, and with the constitution and by-laws of the defendant, and, on demand, had paid regularly the annual dues and all legal assessments made on him by defendant, as in his certificate of membership he had agreed to do. That from the 31st day of July, 1882, to the 31st day of July, 1895, he paid as follows: Beginning September 1, 1882, $18.20, 60 days from each payment to September 1, 1885; from September 1 1885, $28.20, 60 days from each payment to September 1, 1887; from September 1, 1887, $31.20, 60 days from each payment to September 1, 1895,--the said sum of $31.20 being the maximum rate of assessment fixed by the constitution and by-laws of defendant. The reserve fund, being accumulated by the defendant in the manner and for the purpose stated in its contract, has grown steadily under the rates of assessments heretofore of force, and on July 1, 1895, had reached the amount of $3,928,479.55. Independent of this reserve or emergency fund, the income of the defendant has steadily increased, so that for the six months immediately preceding the 1st of July, 1895, the balance of income of the defendant over and above disbursements for the same period was $4,428,766.84. The reserve or emergency fund having grown large enough to meet any unlooked-for death rate, and still growing larger under the then rate of assessment, the members of the defendant company, in annual session, on January 23, 1889, enacted a by-law limiting the rate of assessment upon all those who were members prior to January 1, 1890, to the maximum rate at age of entry. That on August 1, 1895, the directors, of their own motion, repealed this by-law limiting their assessments as hereinbefore stated, and levied, without the knowledge or consent of plaintiff, an excessive assessment on those who were members of said association prior to January 1, 1890, fixing the assessment at double the amount of the maximum rate at the date of their entry as members of the association; and the defendant demanded payment of said increased sum of plaintiff. That plaintiff tendered to defendant's agents in this state the sum of $31.20, being the maximum rate of its assessments at date of his entry into the company, and the maximum sum fixed in the by-law aforesaid, which the said agents refused to receive; that plaintiff then renewed the tender to the company at its home office, in the city of New York, through the vice president of said company, who was authorized to receive the same. He likewise rejected and refused the same. Both of which tenders were made said defendant company within the...
To continue reading
Request your trial