Bare v. Cole
Decision Date | 02 April 1935 |
Docket Number | 42784. |
Parties | BARE v. COLE et al. (METCALF et al., Interveners).[a1] TENER v. TENER et al. |
Court | Iowa Supreme Court |
Appeal from District Court, Marion County; E. W. Dingwell, Judge.
A garnishment proceeding under a general execution, and objections to a guardian's final report in probate, were combined for trial in the district court. The court entered a judgment against the garnishee and sustained the objections to the final report form which judgment and probate order the garnishee, the guardian and the interveners have taken this appeal.
Affirmed.
L. D Teter, of Knoxville, and Watson & Watson, of Indianola, for appellants.
Vander Ploeg & Heer, of Knoxville, for appellee.
The issues may be more readily stated by first reciting the following underlying facts: William T. Tener, Sr., died testate in December, 1919, survived by a widow and several children. One of these children, Walter Tener, was an incompetent. A portion of the will of this decedent was in the following words:
On August 27, 1920, the widow and children and the beneficiaries of William M. Tener, Sr., including Nora Cole, but excepting the incompetent beneficiary, Walter Tener, executed the following instrument:
On October 1, 1920, Nora Cole, one of the heirs and beneficiaries mentioned in the will, was appointed and qualified as guardian of the person and property of Walter Tener, incompetent, and as such guardian received from the executor of the estate of William M. Tener, Sr., pursuant to the above instrument of August 27, 1920, the sum of $7,000. This guardianship continued until the death of Walter Tener on July 16, 1930. The appellee, Mrs. Alice Bare, had obtained a judgment against Nora Cole in October 1923, for $4,084 with interest and costs. Under a general execution, issued on this judgment, Nora Cole, trustee, was garnished on August 11 1930, as a supposed debtor of Nora Cole in her personal capacity. Answers were filed, in the garnishment proceeding, by Nora Cole as trustee and guardian and by Nora Cole as the judgment debtor, alleging that by reason of the instrument of August 27, 1920, above set out, Nora Cole had renounced the provision in the said will giving her $4,000 at the death of Walter Tener and had agreed that the said amount should be thereafter the absolute property of the incompetent Walter Tener, and that by reason thereof Nora Cole as trustee and guardian had in her hands no funds belonging to Nora Cole. The administrator of Walter Tener, and the widow and beneficiaries of William M. Tener, Sr., filed petitions of intervention, alleging the same matters set out in the answer of Nora Cole. These were the issues involved in the trial of the garnishment proceedings:
On August 19, 1930, Nora Cole, as trustee and guardian of Walter Tener filed a final report asking that she be authorized to turn over all assets in her hands to the administrator of the estate of Walter Tener, deceased. Appellee, Alice Bare, filed objections to this final report claiming that she had acquired an interest, by reason of the garnishment proceedings, in such of said funds as belonged to Nora Cole, and this was the issue upon which were tried the objections to the final report.
Appellants say the court erred in entering judgment in the garnishment proceedings against Nora Cole as trustee in favor of the judgment creditor Alice Bare, because the instrument of August 27, 1920, effected a renunciation by Nora Cole of all her interest in the $4,000 given to her at the death of Walter Tener by the terms of the above will, and vested in Walter Tener the absolute title therein. Appellan...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Bare v. Cole
...220 Iowa 338260 N.W. 338BAREv.COLE et al. (METCALF et al., Interveners).a1TENERv.TENER et al.No. 42784.Supreme Court of Iowa.April 2, Appeal from District Court, Marion County; E. W. Dingwell, Judge. A garnishment proceeding under a general execution, and objections to a guardian's final re......