Barefield v. State
| Decision Date | 06 March 1924 |
| Docket Number | A-4454. |
| Citation | 223 P. 408,26 Okla.Crim. 274 |
| Parties | BAREFIELD v. STATE. |
| Court | United States State Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma. Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma |
Syllabus by Editorial Staff.
Where supporting brief is not filed in time, it may be assumed that appeal has been abandoned, and, an examination of the record disclosing no errors, the judgment will be affirmed.
Appeal from County Court, Stephens County; G. T. Burrows, Judge.
Walter Barefield was convicted of the illegal sale of intoxicating liquor, and he appeals. Affirmed.
Wilkinson & Saye, of Duncan, for plaintiff in error.
The Attorney General, for the State.
Walter Barefield was on February 22, 1922, by information filed in the county court of Stephens county, charged with having sold intoxicating liquor contrary to law. At the trial, June 3, 1922, by verdict of a jury he was found guilty as charged, assessing his punishment at confinement in the county jail for a period of 30 days and a fine of $50. From the judgment on the verdict he appeals.
The time for filing a brief supporting the appeal has passed, and, no brief having been filed, it may be assumed that the appeal has been abandoned. The cause has been regularly submitted on the record, which has been examined, disclosing no errors.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial