Barksdale v. Smith
Decision Date | 30 November 1860 |
Parties | BARKSDALE et al. vs. SMITH, BELL & CO. |
Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
Assumpsit, in Wilkes Superior Court. Tried before Judge Thomas, at the September Term, 1860.
The record in this case presents the following facts and questions, to wit:
Mrs. Sarah Stokes died testate. Amongst other things, she directed, in her will, that certain property should be sold, and that the funds arising therefrom amongst other named legatees.
The will further provided that the property bequeathed by it should be for the sole and separate use and benefit of the legatees, and not subject to any debts or contracts, but to be received and managed by a trustee.
There was no trustee appointed in the will.
Nicholas G. Barksdale was duly qualified as administrator of Sarah Stokes, with the will annexed, and before any trustee was appointed, an order was drawn on, and accepted by him, of which the following is a copy:
On the back of the order was written the following acceptance:
N. G. Barksdale acted as administrator, with the will annexed, of Sarah Stokes, from 1848 up to the time of his death, in the latter part of the year 1856.
Thomas A. Barksdale and James H. Willis were appointed administrators of N. G. Barksdale, and continued to managethe property bequeathed by Sarah Stokes, for the support of John A. Stokes and Armstead T. Stokes, until September or October, 1857, when William M. Reese was appointed trustee for Armstead T. Stokes and John A. Stokes.
In October, 1857, Reese and the administrators of Barksdale came to a settlement, in which it was found that there was due the trustee of the Stokeses something over $7,000, which amount was subject to various demands against the Stokeses for support, etc., some of which were allowed in the settlement. These being deducted, left over $5,000, which the administrator of Barksdale paid over to Reese, the trustee.
Smith, Bell & Co. sued the administrators of...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Smith v. Wallace Nat. Bank
... ... (Clifford v. Denver ... etc. Ry. Co., 12 Colo. 125, 20 P. 333; Braithwaite ... v. Aiken, 2 N.D. 57, 49 N.W. 419.) A new trial should ... not be granted unless it appears that an injustice has been ... done. (Manning v. German Ins. Co., 107 F. 52, 46 C ... C. A. 144; Barksdale v. Smith, 31 Ga. 671; ... Woodward v. Horst, 10 Iowa 120; Rowe v. Matthews, 18 ... Chas ... E. Miller and Featherstone & Fox, for Respondent Smith ... When, ... in the course of his employment, an officer or other agent of ... a bank acquires knowledge or receives notice ... ...
- Lynch v. Jackson