Barnes v. Serna
Decision Date | 12 April 2011 |
Docket Number | Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-155 |
Parties | Thomas J. Barnes, Appellant, v. Victor M. Serna and Does 1 Through 50, Defendants, Of Whom Victor M. Serna is the Respondent. |
Court | South Carolina Court of Appeals |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
Appeal From Charleston County
Doyet A. Early, III, Circuit Court Judge
AFFIRMED
Thomas J. Barnes, pro se, of Goose Creek, for Appellant.
Duke R. Highfield, Stephen L. Brown, and Russell Hines, all of Charleston, for Respondent.
Thomas J. Barnes appeals the dismissal of his action against Victor M. Serna. Barnes alleges the trial court (1) lacked jurisdiction to dismiss his case; (2) violated his right to due process; (3) failed to make sufficiently specific findings of fact and conclusions of law; and (4) abused its discretion in dismissing the case for the failure to prosecute and refusal to comply with a discovery order to produce his tax returns. Moreover, Barnes's Statement of Issues on Appeal include whether the trial court abused its discretion in (1) granting attorney's fees and costs; (2) "sanctioning [Barnes] for no good cause shown" under Rule 11(a), SCRCP; and (3) "permitting [Serna] to shop around until [he] found a judge that dismissed th[e] case." We affirm1 pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the following authorities:
1. As to whether the trial court lacked jurisdiction and violated Barnes's right to due process: R & G Constr., Inc. v. Lowcountry Reg'l Transp. Auth., 343 S.C. 424, 437, 540 S.E.2d 113, 120 (Ct. App. 2000) ( ); Carolina Water Serv., Inc. v. Lexington Cnty. Joint Mun. Water & Sewer Comm'n, 367 S.C. 141, 149, 625 S.E.2d 227, 231 (Ct. App. 2006) (), rev'd on other grounds, 373 S.C. 96, 97, 644 S.E.2d 681, 681 (2007).
2. As to whether the trial court's dismissal order included sufficiently specific findings: Rule 208(b)(1)(B), SCACR ().
3. As to the issues relating to the grant of attorney's fees and costs; sanctions pursuant to Rule 11(a), SCRCP; and court shopping: Jinks v. Richland Cnty., 355 S.C. 341, 344 n.3, 585 S.E.2d 281, 283 n.3 (2003) ( ).
4. As to whether the trial court abused its discretion in dismissing Barnes's case for the refusal to comply with discovery orders:2 Rule 26(b), SCRCP ( ); Rule 37(b)(2)(C), SCRCP ( ); Barnette v. Adams Bros. Logging, Inc., 355 S.C 588, 593, 586 S.E.2d 572, 575 (2003) ( ...
To continue reading
Request your trial