Barnes v. State, A00A1137.

• Decision Date: 25 April 2000
• Docket Number: No. A00A1137.,A00A1137.
• Citation: 534 S.E.2d 440,243 Ga. App. 703
• Parties: BARNES v. The STATE.
• Court: Georgia Court of Appeals

534 S.E.2d 440

243 Ga. App. 703

BARNES v. The STATE.

No. A00A1137.

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

April 25, 2000.

Norman L. Barnes, pro se.

Robert E. Keller, District Attorney, Jack S. Jennings, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.

BARNES, Judge.

Norman Lee Barnes appeals the dismissal of his motion for an out-of-time appeal. He contends that his constitutional and statutory rights to appeal his convictions were violated by his trial attorney's failure to file a motion for new trial and to file a notice of appeal. Because we find the record does not show a determination by the trial court that Barnes forfeited his rights to appeal his convictions, we remand this case for that adjudication.

On November 10, 1993, a jury convicted Barnes of two counts of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon, a pistol. The trial court then imposed a recidivist sentence upon Barnes, a repeat offender. For reasons not adequately explained by the record, no appeal followed. More than six years after the verdict and sentencing, Barnes filed a pro se motion for an out-of-time appeal. In this motion, Barnes asserted that his defense counsel failed "to perfect and pursue a direct appeal."

Without providing an explanation, the trial court dismissed the motion for an out-of-time appeal. Although the trial court's order does not reflect that a hearing was held on Barnes' motion, and there is no transcript of a hearing, in an earlier order the court directed that Barnes be brought to the courthouse "to appear for his motion for out-of-time appeal." Barnes appeals the dismissal of his motion for out-of-time appeal.

Although the State argues that Barnes' motion for an out-of-time appeal was actually an extraordinary motion for new trial requiring a discretionary application, we disagree. See Lunsford v. State, 237 Ga. App. 696, 515 S.E.2d 198 (1999) (order denying a motion for an out-of-time appeal is directly appealable). The State's position that this appeal is procedurally foreclosed lacks merit. See Bohannon v. State, 262 Ga. 697, 425 S.E.2d 653 (1993).

As a fundamental principle of law,

[o]ur courts have long recognized the right to effective assistance of counsel on appeal from a criminal conviction, and have permitted out of time appeals if the appellant was denied his right of appeal through counsel's negligence or ignorance, or if the appellant was not adequately informed of his appeal rights.

(Citations and punctuation omitted.) Hasty v. State, 213 Ga.App. 731-732, 445 S.E.2d 836 (1994). If a timely direct appeal was not taken as the result of ineffective assistance of counsel, then an out-of-time appeal is appropriate. Gibbs v. State, 239 Ga.App. 249, 519 S.E.2d 511 (1999). When a criminal defendant has lost his right to appellate review of his conviction due to error of counsel, he is entitled to an out-of-time appeal. Rowland v. State, 264 Ga. 872, 875(2), 452 S.E.2d 756 (1995). But when a convicted party by his own conduct or in concert with his counsel has slept on his rights, he forfeits his right to appeal. Cannon v. State, 175 Ga.App. 741, 742, 334 S.E.2d 342 (1985).

In this case, we cannot determine from the record before us wh...