Barnett v. Couey
Citation | 27 S.W.2d 757,224 Mo.App. 913 |
Decision Date | 05 May 1930 |
Docket Number | 16900. |
Parties | LAWRENCE BARNETT, ADMR., APPELLANT, v. E. W. COUEY, ADMR., RESPONDENT |
Court | Court of Appeals of Kansas |
Appeal from Circuit Court of Pettis County.--Hon. Dimmitt Hoffman Judge.
Action in equity by Lawrence Barnett, administrator of the estate of Cora Washington, deceased, against E. W. Couey, administrator of the estate of James Washington, deceased. From a judgment of dismissal, plaintiff appeals.
REVERSED AND REMANDED (with directions).
Judgment reversed and remanded.
Barnett & Hayes for appellant.
D. E Kennedy and Shain & O'Bannon for respondent.
Trimble, P. J., absent.
This is an action in equity brought by plaintiff, as the administrator of the estate of Cora Washington, deceased, whereby he seeks to have defendant, as administrator of the estate of James Washington, deceased, declared trustee of one-half the proceeds of certain bank deposits. Said deceased persons were husband and wife and formerly owned said deposits as an estate by the entirety.
A demurrer was sustained to the petition filed by plaintiff, and upon his refusal to plead further, the cause was dismissed. From this judgment of dismissal plaintiff has duly appealed.
Since the controversy arises as to the sufficiency of the petition, and the court's action in sustaining the demurrer thereto, the charging part of the petition is here set forth as follows:
The petition concludes with a prayer that the defendant be declared a constructive trustee for the benefit of the estate of Cora Washington, deceased, to the extent of $ 1537.42 and that an order be made requiring him to account for any pay over to the plaintiff, as administrator, pendente lite, the said sum of money.
As reasons for his demurrer, defendant pleaded as follows:
In addition to the facts admitted of record by the pleadings filed, counsel for defendant, in their brief, frankly concede James Washington wrongfully killed his wife and immediately afterward committed suicide; that, as administrator of the estate of said deceased husband, defendant took charge of all the funds formerly held by said husband and wife as an estate by the entirety. The exact question presented for our determination under the pleadings and admitted facts conceded of record is, whether a husband, wilfully killing his wife, may become, as survivor, the sole and unconditional owner of an estate by the entirety so that he, or those claiming under him, may have and enjoy the full benefit thereof. Or, as expressed by counsel for defendant, is a court of equity authorized to impress a trust thereon to the extent of one-half of said estate, in favor of the heirs at law of such deceased co-tenant by entirety. The issue here presented has never been ruled upon in this State, so far as we are able to determine. In considering the matter submitted to the trial court sitting as a chancellor, and now before us for review, in the light of the circumstances indicated, certain well-settled equitable rules and principles should be recognized, to-wit: (1) No one shall be permitted to profit by his fraud, or wrong. (2) Neither shall he be permitted to found any claim his own iniquity, nor acquire property by his own crime. If, therefore, application of these rules be permitted in the instant case, the principles underlying them should be followed.
Defendant in his brief directs our attention to the case of Garner v. Jones, 52 Mo. 68; Brewing Company v. Saxy, 273 Mo. 159, 162, 201 S.W. 67; Wimbush v. Danford, 292 Mo. 588, 238 S.W. 460; Wilson v. Frost, 186 Mo. 311, 319, 85 S.W. 375; Frost v. Frost, 200 Mo. 474, 481, 98 S.W. 527, in support of his argument that each owns the whole estate and the survivor takes all, in any event of the decease of the cotenant by the entirety, without exception. He further argues that to grant plaintiff the relief sought would operate as a bill of attainder or forfeiture of the survivor's estate. On the contrary, plaintiff asserts this bill in equity was not brought for the purpose of causing James Washington or his heirs to forfeit any part of his estate because of the crime, but rather to prevent James Washington and his heir from enriching themselves as a result of his criminal act. The power of a court of equity is invoked to declare a resultant or constructive trust not for the entire estate, but for one-half of the fund in question.
We have carefully read the authorities cited by defendant but are not persuaded they are applicable, and they do not purport to pass on the direct question here presented. The effect of what they hold, under the facts recited, is clearly distinguishable from the present case and the theory upon which plaintiff seeks relief. It is not intended by our conclusions to question the well settled principles of law governing the creation and incidents of an estate by the entirety. We merely say that the ordinary rules of construction and operation do not extend to, or have within their contemplation, a survivorship which arises by a wrongful, illegal and felonious homicide committed by such survivor who, and those under him, may claim all the entirety estate. The principles generally governing such estates at common law must receive a reasonable interpretation consonant with the apparent object and plain intent of their creation. Unless we do violence to the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Grose v. Holland
...felonious act of one of the parties thereto, a court of equity should treat the estate as one being held as tenants in common. Barnett v. Couey, 27 S.W.2d 757; State ex v. Ellison, 233 S.W. 1065; Sherman v. Webber, 167 A. 517; Bryant v. Bryant, 137 S.E. 188; Zanzonico v. Zanzonico, 2 A.2d 5......
-
De Zotell v. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York
... ... Tuffy (1918) 103 Misc. 455, 169 N.Y.S. 173; ... Bryant v. Bryant (1927) 193 N.C. 372, 137 S.E. 188, ... 51 A. L. R. 1100; and Barnett v. Couey (1930) 224 ... Mo.App. 913, 27 S.W.2d 757, the last three of which deal with ... tenancies by the entirety. The general course of the ... ...
- Gray v. School Dist. No. 73 of Clay County
-
General American Life Insurance Company v. Cole
...124 S.W.2d 541, 542. However, no one shall be permitted to found a claim on inequity nor acquire property by crime. Barnett v. Couey, 224 Mo.App. 913, 27 S.W.2d 757, 758. Therefore, if James died without a will, and he did, the proceeds of the policies of insurance in question could not go ......