Barnicle v. Connor
Citation | 81 N.W. 452,110 Iowa 238 |
Parties | J. K. BARNICLE v. A. H. CONNOR & CO., Appellants |
Decision Date | 18 January 1900 |
Court | United States State Supreme Court of Iowa |
Appeal from Cedar Rapids Superior Court.--HON. T. M. GIBERSON Judge.
ACTION at law to recover for personal injuries. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendants appeal.
Reversed.
Powell & Harmon for appellants.
Jamison & Smyth for appellee.
OPINION
The plaintiff is a carpenter, and was employed by the defendants to work on a building they were erecting. While helping to move a large iron column, he was injured. The negligence complained of is charged in the petition in substantially the following language: The defendants were building contractors, and were engaged in erecting a large building at Cedar Rapids, Iowa. One Homer Wells was employed by them. He was a carpenter, and was the foreman of the carpenter force at work on the building in question. The plaintiff and the other carpenters were under his direction and control as to their work, but he had no power to hire or discharge them. He was present, directing and assisting in the movement of the column which inflicted the injury to the plaintiff. The plaintiff, in his testimony, says that quite a number of persons assisted in that work, and that he and Mr. Wells put the dolly under the column, and that immediately thereafter Mr. Wells directed him to block the column, so that it would not roll; that he (plaintiff) told Mr. Wells that it would roll if he let go of it, and that Mr. Wells then took hold of the column with both hands, and said, "Go, and do as I told you;" that the plaintiff then let go, and just as he was turning around, the column rolled and struck him. The defendants are not charged with furnishing improper or imperfect machinery or material for the work in question; nor are they charged with negligence in the employment of Wells. The...
To continue reading
Request your trial