Barone v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc.

Decision Date12 April 1999
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
PartiesLINDA BARONE et al., Appellants,<BR>v.<BR>GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, INC., Respondent.

O'Brien, J. P., Ritter, Joy and Altman, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

It is well established that a corporation has the right in the first instance to determine which of its representatives will appear for an examination before trial (see, Mercado v Alexander, 227 AD2d 391; Defina v Brooklyn Union Gas Co., 217 AD2d 681, 682; Tower v Chemical Bank, 140 AD2d 514, 515). Here, the defendant produced two knowledgeable witnesses who testified with respect to the underlying incident. The plaintiff failed to show that those witnesses had insufficient knowledge or were otherwise inadequate, and that the proposed witnesses possessed information which was material and necessary to the prosecution of the case (see, Saxe v City of New York, 250 AD2d 751; Carter v New York City Bd. of Educ., 225 AD2d 512; Defina v Brooklyn Union Gas Co., supra). Accordingly, the court, upon reargument, properly denied the plaintiffs' motion to compel further depositions.

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • Trueforge Global Mach. Corp.. v. Group
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • May 10, 2011
    ...which of its representatives will appear for an examination before trial” [84 A.D.3d 940] ( Barone v. Great Atl. & Pac. Tea Co., 260 A.D.2d 417, 417–418, 687 N.Y.S.2d 718; see Aronson v. Im, 81 A.D.3d 577, 577, 915 N.Y.S.2d 639; Nunez v. Chase Manhattan Bank, 71 A.D.3d 967, 896 N.Y.S.2d 472......
  • Gomez v. State
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • May 15, 2013
    ...A.D.3d 930, 932–933, 864 N.Y.S.2d 500; Nazario v. City of New York, 27 A.D.3d 439, 810 N.Y.S.2d 342; Barone v. Great Atl. & Pac. Tea Co., 260 A.D.2d 417, 417–418, 687 N.Y.S.2d 718). Whether the defendant had the authority to supervise the means and methods of the work is material and releva......
  • Conte v. County of Nassau
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • August 9, 2011
    ...391; Sladowski–Casolaro v. World Championship Wrestling, Inc., 47 A.D.3d 803, 850 N.Y.S.2d 176; Barone v. Great Atl. & Pac. Tea Co., 260 A.D.2d 417, 417–418, 687 N.Y.S.2d 718; Saxe v. City of New York, 250 A.D.2d 751, 752, 671 N.Y.S.2d 1002). DILLON, J.P., LEVENTHAL, HALL and LOTT, JJ.,...
  • Spohn-Konen v. Town of Brookhaven
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • June 15, 2010
    ...Sladowski-Casolaro v. World Championship Wrestling, Inc., 47 A.D.3d 803, 803-804, 850 N.Y.S.2d 176; Barone v. Great Atl. & Pac. Tea Co., 260 A.D.2d 417, 417-418, 687 N.Y.S.2d 718; Saxe v. City of New York, 250 A.D.2d at 752, 671 N.Y.S.2d 1002). MASTRO, J.P., ENG, LEVENTHAL and ROMAN, JJ.,...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT