Barron v. Missouri Lead & Zinc Co.
Decision Date | 24 February 1903 |
Citation | 72 S.W. 534,172 Mo. 228 |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Parties | BARRON v. MISSOURI LEAD & ZINC CO. |
Appeal from circuit court, Jasper county; Jos. D. Perkins, Judge.
Action by Rachel Barron against the Missouri Lead & Zinc Company. From a judgment in favor of defendant, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.
On October 22, 1898, this suit was commenced in the circuit court of Jasper county, Mo., by filing with the clerk of said court the following petition: Summons having been served, returnable to the December term, 1898, of said court, the defendant, on December 5, 1898, appeared, and filed its demurrer in said cause, in words and figures as follows, omitting caption: And afterwards, on December 24, 1898, during said term, the said demurrer of defendant to the petition of plaintiff coming on to be heard, the same was, by the court, sustained, and, the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Demattei v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas R. Co.
... ... Rep. 348. See ... also Barker v. Hannibal & St. L. Railroad, 91 Mo ... 86, 14 S.W. 280; Barron v. Mo. Lead & Zinc Co., 172 ... Mo. 228, 72 S.W. 534; Packard v. Hannibal & St. J ... Railroad, ... ...
-
Holley v. St. Joseph Lead Co.
... ... St. Joseph Lead Company (Employer), Defendant-Appellant No. 39964 Supreme Court of Missouri April 21, 1947 ... ... Rehearing Denied May 12, 1947 ... Ronchetto v. Northern ... Central Coal Co., 179 Mo.App. 215, 166 S.W. 876; ... Barron v. Missouri Lead & Zinc Co., 172 Mo. 228, 72 ... S.W. 534. (11) The employer is not required, in ... ...
-
Chandler v. Chicago & Alton Railroad Company
... ... HOLLIDAY, Appellants Supreme Court of Missouri, First DivisionJune 28, 1913 ... Appeal ... from ... Moore, 31 Mo ... 574; Oates v. Railroad, 104 Mo. 518; Barron v ... Lead and Zinc Co., 172 Mo. 228, 72 S.W. 534; Packard ... v ... ...
-
Clark v. Kansas City, St. Louis & Chicago Railroad Company
...Brewing Co., 145 Mo. 104; Bellamy v. Whitsell, 123 Mo.App. 610; Oates v. Railroad, 104 Mo. 518; Barker v. Railroad, 91 Mo. 94; Barron v. Min. Co., 172 Mo. 228. Counsel plaintiff practically concedes the correctness of our position, as stated above, and attempts to evade it by making the fat......