Bartlett v. State, 93-0309

Decision Date06 July 1994
Docket NumberNo. 93-0309,93-0309
Citation638 So.2d 631
Parties19 Fla. L. Weekly D1452 Marcus BARTLETT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Appeal from the Circuit Court for St. Lucie County; L.B. Vocelle, Judge.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Eric M. Cumfer, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Don M. Rogers, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was charged by information with capital sexual battery on a minor. He petitioned the trial court to enter a plea of nolo contendere to the charge of lewd and lascivious assault. The trial court adjudicated him guilty of lewd assault on a child under sixteen and sentenced him to a term of seven years in prison followed by a term of eight years probation. The trial court imposed various fees and costs as special conditions of probation. It also orally ordered that the costs of supervision for probation and payment of court costs be waived for ninety days from the date of appellant's release from prison, but this provision does not appear in the written judgment or probation order. Appellant appeals to this court, raising three issues.

Appellant first argues, and the state concedes, that the written order must conform with the trial court's pronouncement in open court. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.700; Kord v. State, 508 So.2d 758 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987) (general rule is that written order must conform to the oral pronouncement of judgment and sentence). Accordingly, we reverse this point on appeal and remand for the inclusion of the ninety days' waiver from cost of supervision and court costs from the date of appellant's release from prison.

Appellant also argues that the trial court erred in ordering him to pay $50 court costs pursuant to section 960.20, Florida Statutes, alleging that the charge should have been for the payment of only $20. We agree. Under section 960.20, Florida Statutes (1991), the amount was $20. The legislature increased the amount payable to the crimes compensation trust fund from $20 to $50, effective October 1, 1992. Ch. 92-287, Laws of Fla. Appellant committed the crime in the instant case between December 26, 1991 and September 1, 1992. Therefore, he can be charged only $20 on remand. State v. Yost, 507 So.2d 1099 (Fla.1987).

On the third point, the trial court did not err in sua sponte ordering appellant to pay a public...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Justice v. State, 86264
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • 23 Mayo 1996
    ...District: see, e.g., Vasquez v. State, 663 So.2d 1343 (Fla. 4th DCA), review dismissed, 666 So.2d 145 (Fla.1995); Bartlett v. State, 638 So.2d 631 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994); Skiff v. State, 627 So.2d 614 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993).2 The court modified the defendant's probation by: (1) extending the term......
  • Vasquez v. State, 94-1732
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 25 Octubre 1995
    ...DCA 1987), in recognition of this principle, we struck the imposition of costs which were not orally pronounced. In Bartlett v. State, 638 So.2d 631 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994), where the trial court had orally ordered costs be waived for 90 days from the date of release from prison, but the writte......
  • Burdo v. State, 94-2553
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 31 Enero 1996
    ...AT RESENTENCING? Justice v. State, 658 So.2d at 1034; contra, Vasquez v. State, 663 So.2d 1343 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995); Bartlett v. State, 638 So.2d 631 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994); Turchario v. State, 616 So.2d 539 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993); Christobal v. State, 598 So.2d 325 (Fla. 1st DCA Lastly, we strike ......
  • Tarrant v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 31 Enero 1996
    ...the incident was alleged to have taken place, the amount payable to the Crimes Compensation Trust Fund was $20.00. See Bartlett v. State, 638 So.2d 631 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994); Chapman v. State, 651 So.2d 223 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995); and Ch. 92-287, Laws of Fla. The state further concedes that the ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT