Basham v. County Court Of Kanawha County

Decision Date28 November 1933
Docket Number(No. 7823)
Citation114 W.Va. 376
CourtWest Virginia Supreme Court
PartiesLulu Basham v. County Court of Kanawha County

Master and Servant

A contract of employment for remuneration is necessary to constitute the relation of employer and employee under the Compensation Act.

Mandamus proceeding by Lulu Basham against the County Court of Kanawha County.

Writ denied.

J. E. Springston, for relator.

Homer A. Holt, Attorney General, R. Dennis Steed and Kenneth E. Hines, Assistant Attorneys General, and Dale G. Casto, for respondent.

Litz, Judge:

Lulu Basham, dependent widow of Charles Basham, deceased, seeks a writ of mandamus compelling the county court of Kanawha County to report an accident, causing his death, to the state compensation commissioner and requiring the commissioner to furnish her prescribed forms for the filing of a claim (under the Workmen's Compensation Act), for compensation to herself, and her four infant children, under sixteen years of age.

Charles Basham, in some manner not disclosed in the record, sustained a fatal injury January 10, 1933, while working on a county road in Kanawha County. He was employed (with others) by the county welfare board (an agency of the state unemployment relief administration), in the expenditure or distribution of relief funds furnished by the Reconstruction Finance Corporation of the Federal Government. The only connection of the county court with this scheme for the relief of unemployed was to assign and supervise the work. It did not employ, discharge, or pay the workers.

The question, therefore, for solution is whether the deceased was, at the time of this injury, an employee of the county court in contemplation of the compensation act, pertinent provisions of which follow: "All persons, firms, associations and corporations regularly employing other persons for the purpose of carrying on any form of industry or business in this State, county courts and municipal corporations, the State of West Virginia, and all governmental agencies or departments created by it, are employers within the meaning of this chapter and subject to its provisions. All persons in the service of employers as herein defined and employed by them for the purpose of carrying on the industry, business or work in which they are engaged, and checkweighmen employed according to law, are employees within the meaning of this chapter and subject to its provisions * * *." Chapter 23, article 2, section 1, Code 1931.

"For the purpose of creating a workmen's compensation fund each employer subject to this chapter shall pay the premiums of liability based upon and being such a percentage of the payroll of such employer as may have been determined by the commissioner and be then in effect. The premiums shall be paid monthly, on or before the twenty-fifth of each month, for the preceding month, and shall be the prescribed percentage of the total earnings of all employees within the meaning of this chapter, whose work is within this State, for such preceding month." Section 5 of the same chapter and article.

These and other...

To continue reading

Request your trial
10 cases
  • Davis v. Fire Creek Fuel Co.
    • United States
    • West Virginia Supreme Court
    • June 9, 1959
    ...for remuneration is necessary to constitute the relation of employer and employee under the Compensation Act.' Syllabus, Basham v. Kanawha County Court, 114 W.Va. 376 3. At common law, if the relationship of master and servant exists in any given instance and the servant or employee is not ......
  • Dodson v. WORKERS'COMPENSATION DIV.
    • United States
    • West Virginia Supreme Court
    • November 8, 2001
    ...to constitute the relation of employer and employee under the [Workers'] Compensation Act." Syllabus, Basham v. County Court of Kanawha County, 114 W.Va. 376, 171 S.E. 893 (1933).8 Consequently, to determine whether Appellant was an employee when the injury occurred, we must consider whethe......
  • Borders v. Cline, 309.
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • November 24, 1937
    ...Dept., etc., 206 N.C. 206, 173 S.E. 603, 605; citing In re Moore, 97 Ind.App. 492, 187 N.E. 219; Basham v. Kanawha County Court (1933) 114 W.Va. 376, 171 S.E. 893. In the instant case the claimant Borders is a regular deputy appointed by the sheriff, and received as his only compensation fe......
  • Borders v. Cline
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • November 24, 1937
    ... ... ROSS v. SAME. BYERS v. SAME. No. 309.Supreme Court of North CarolinaNovember 24, 1937 ... Appeal ... from Superior Court, Cleveland County; Felix E. Alley, Judge ...          Proceeding ... Ind.App. 492, 187 N.E. 219; Basham v. Kanawha County ... Court (1933) 114 W.Va. 376, 171 S.E ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT