Basham v. County Court Of Kanawha County
Decision Date | 28 November 1933 |
Docket Number | (No. 7823) |
Citation | 114 W.Va. 376 |
Court | West Virginia Supreme Court |
Parties | Lulu Basham v. County Court of Kanawha County |
Master and Servant
A contract of employment for remuneration is necessary to constitute the relation of employer and employee under the Compensation Act.
Mandamus proceeding by Lulu Basham against the County Court of Kanawha County.
Writ denied.
J. E. Springston, for relator.
Homer A. Holt, Attorney General, R. Dennis Steed and Kenneth E. Hines, Assistant Attorneys General, and Dale G. Casto, for respondent.
Lulu Basham, dependent widow of Charles Basham, deceased, seeks a writ of mandamus compelling the county court of Kanawha County to report an accident, causing his death, to the state compensation commissioner and requiring the commissioner to furnish her prescribed forms for the filing of a claim (under the Workmen's Compensation Act), for compensation to herself, and her four infant children, under sixteen years of age.
Charles Basham, in some manner not disclosed in the record, sustained a fatal injury January 10, 1933, while working on a county road in Kanawha County. He was employed (with others) by the county welfare board (an agency of the state unemployment relief administration), in the expenditure or distribution of relief funds furnished by the Reconstruction Finance Corporation of the Federal Government. The only connection of the county court with this scheme for the relief of unemployed was to assign and supervise the work. It did not employ, discharge, or pay the workers.
The question, therefore, for solution is whether the deceased was, at the time of this injury, an employee of the county court in contemplation of the compensation act, pertinent provisions of which follow: Chapter 23, article 2, section 1, Code 1931.
Section 5 of the same chapter and article.
These and other...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Davis v. Fire Creek Fuel Co.
...for remuneration is necessary to constitute the relation of employer and employee under the Compensation Act.' Syllabus, Basham v. Kanawha County Court, 114 W.Va. 376 3. At common law, if the relationship of master and servant exists in any given instance and the servant or employee is not ......
-
Dodson v. WORKERS'COMPENSATION DIV.
...to constitute the relation of employer and employee under the [Workers'] Compensation Act." Syllabus, Basham v. County Court of Kanawha County, 114 W.Va. 376, 171 S.E. 893 (1933).8 Consequently, to determine whether Appellant was an employee when the injury occurred, we must consider whethe......
-
Borders v. Cline, 309.
...Dept., etc., 206 N.C. 206, 173 S.E. 603, 605; citing In re Moore, 97 Ind.App. 492, 187 N.E. 219; Basham v. Kanawha County Court (1933) 114 W.Va. 376, 171 S.E. 893. In the instant case the claimant Borders is a regular deputy appointed by the sheriff, and received as his only compensation fe......
-
Borders v. Cline
... ... ROSS v. SAME. BYERS v. SAME. No. 309.Supreme Court of North CarolinaNovember 24, 1937 ... Appeal ... from Superior Court, Cleveland County; Felix E. Alley, Judge ... Proceeding ... Ind.App. 492, 187 N.E. 219; Basham v. Kanawha County ... Court (1933) 114 W.Va. 376, 171 S.E ... ...