Baskin v. State, 2D04-671.
| Decision Date | 18 March 2005 |
| Docket Number | No. 2D04-671.,2D04-671. |
| Parties | Willie J. BASKIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Cynthia J. Dodge, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Dale E. Tarpley, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.
Willie J. Baskin appeals his sentences imposed after he entered an open plea to four felony offenses. We reverse the sentences and remand for resentencing.
Baskin entered an open plea of no contest to the four felony charges on June 21, 2001. On July 16, 2001, Baskin appeared for sentencing before a judge other than the one who accepted his plea. Baskin objected to the successor judge imposing the sentences, but the successor judge denied the objection. The successor judge then sentenced Baskin for the four offenses.
On appeal, Baskin argues that it was error for the successor judge to sentence him without a showing of a necessity or emergency situation requiring such sentencing. The State claims that Baskin failed to preserve the issue for appeal because Baskin's objection was insufficient. The State argues that Baskin's objection was insufficient because it was based solely "on principle" and not on the citation of any supporting rule or case law.
Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.700(c)(1), provides:
In any case, other than a capital case, in which it is necessary that sentence be pronounced by a judge other than the judge who presided at trial or accepted the plea, the sentencing judge shall not pass sentence until the judge becomes acquainted with what transpired at the trial, or the facts, including any plea discussions, concerning the plea and the offense.
Under this provision, it is improper for a successor judge to sentence a defendant unless the record shows that the substitution of judges is necessary or dictated by an emergency. Clemons v. State, 816 So.2d 1180, 1182 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Madrigal v. State, 683 So.2d 1093, 1096-97 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); Mack v. State, 643 So.2d 701, 701 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994); Lawley v. State, 377 So.2d 824, 824-25 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979). Where sentence is improperly imposed by a successor judge, the sentence will be reversed even without a specific showing of how the sentencing by the successor judge caused prejudice to the defendant. See Clemons, 816 So.2d at 1182; Madrigal, 683 So.2d at 1096-97. In effect, the improper sentencing by a successor judge is treated as prejudicial per se.
Here, the record of the sentencing hearing does not indicate that the substitution of judges for sentencing was necessary or dictated by an emergency. Baskin is therefore entitled to resentencing if — contrary to the State's argument — his objection to the sentencing by the successor judge was properly preserved.
Section 924.051(3), Florida Statutes (2000), provides, with respect to criminal appeals: "An appeal may not be taken from a judgment or order of a trial court unless a prejudicial error is alleged and is properly preserved or, if not properly preserved, would constitute fundamental error." Section 924.051(1)(b) provides:
"Preserved" means that an issue, legal argument, or objection to evidence was timely raised before, and ruled on by, the trial court, and that the issue,...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Lincare Holdings Inc. v. Ford
...is "sufficiently precise that it fairly apprised the trial court of the relief sought and the grounds therefor." See Baskin v. State, 898 So. 2d 266, 267 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005) (recognizing that citation to legal authority is not the critical component of preserving an issue in the trial court ......
-
Lopez v. State, 2D04-1293.
...a defendant unless the record shows that the substitution of judges is necessary or dictated by an emergency." Baskin v. State, 898 So.2d 266, 267 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005); Clemons v. State, 816 So.2d 1180, 1182 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002). Such sentencing is improper even without a showing of prejudice t......
-
State v. Casey, 2D04-4460.
...apprised the trial court of the relief sought and the grounds therefor." § 924.051(1)(b), Fla. Stat. (2004); accord Baskin v. State, 898 So.2d 266, 267 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005) (finding that although counsel was "unable to provide any legal authority," counsel preserved the issue by calling atten......
-
Gay v. State
...imposed sentence." Persaud v. State, 821 So.2d 411, 414 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); see also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.700(c); Baskin v. State, 898 So.2d 266, 266 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005); Snyder v. State, 870 So.2d 140, 142-43 (Fla. 2d DCA The State acknowledges that the judge who originally sentenced Gay, Judg......