Bass v. Morgan, Lewis & Bockius

Decision Date01 December 1987
Docket NumberNo. 85-1286,85-1286
Parties12 Fla. L. Weekly 2714 Paul H. BASS, Appellant, v. MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS, a partnership and Angel Castillo, Jr., Appellees.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Krongold & Bass and Paul Bass, Coral Gables, and Horton, Perse & Ginsberg, Miami, for appellant.

Morgan, Lewis & Bockius and Paul J. Levine and Gary S. Koenigsberg and Lowell L. Garrett, Sam Daniels, and Daniels & Hicks, Miami, for appellees.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and JORGENSON, JJ.

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

The opinion in this cause filed April 15, 1986, is hereby withdrawn and the following opinion is substituted in its place.

This is an appeal from the dismissal with prejudice of an amended complaint which, insofar as is now relevant, claimed the right to compensatory and punitive damages on the theory that a letter written by the appellee Castillo to the appellant Bass violated section 836.05, Florida Statutes (1983), which creates the crime of extortion. 1 We affirm.

We do not decide whether the contents of the correspondence in question were in fact in violation of the pertinent statute. 2 This is because we hold that no violation of the statute gives rise to a civil cause of action. In the recent case of Lavis Plumbing Services, Inc. v. Johnson, 515 So.2d 296, 298 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), this court noted that the

mere violation of the penal statutes does not give rise to liability per se. Tourismart of America, Inc. v. Gonzalez, 498 So.2d 469 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986).

It was pointed out that such liability could arise only from the violation of a provision which imposes a duty for the benefit of a special class of individuals. Accordingly, Lavis Plumbing Services, Inc. held that, because section 843.08, the "impersonating an officer" statute, was intended to protect only the public and did not fall within this description, its violation did not create a damage action. The statutory history and intendment of the extortion statute before us cannot be distinguished from the one considered in Lavis. Consequently, we are bound to hold that the civil cause of action now asserted may not be maintained. In doing so, we reach the same conclusion as that in Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. Ferre, 636 F.Supp. 970 (S.D.Fla.1985), which squarely so held as to the identical issue involving the Florida extortion statute, and by well reasoned authority from a sibling jurisdiction. Grimm v. Bam, 22 Misc.2d 982, 195 N.Y.S.2d 36 (Sup.Ct.1959). Contra Elbe v. Wausau Hosp. Center, 606 F.Supp. 1491 (W.D.Wis.1985), aff'd sub. nom. Callaway v. Hafeman, 832 F.2d 414 (7th Cir.1987).

Affirmed.

1 The appellant Bass also alleged a defamation claim but does not challenge the trial court's dismissal of that count.

Similarly, Bass does not contend that there is any common law action for damages based upon allegedly extortionate conduct. In fact, it is clear that none exists. Leventhal...

To continue reading

Request your trial
11 cases
  • Fischer v. Metcalf
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • April 18, 1989
    ...applied the Rosenberg test but have incorporated the substance of the Cort factors into our analyses. See Bass v. Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, 516 So.2d 1011 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987) (court looked to additional factors of statutory history and intendment of extortion statute to hold no civil cause of......
  • Machinery Hauling, Inc. v. Steel of West Virginia
    • United States
    • West Virginia Supreme Court
    • July 27, 1989
    ...argue that there is no general authority that recognizes the right to recover civil damages for extortion, citing Bass v. Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, 516 So.2d 1011 (Fla.App.1987), review denied, 525 So.2d 876 (Fla.1988), and several cases from other jurisdictions cited therein. However, in th......
  • Eley v. Evans
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Virginia
    • February 6, 2007
    ...11, 2001); Johnson v. Freedman, No. 110411, 1992 WL 884626, at *1 (Va. Cir. Ct. Apr. 8, 1992) (citing Bass v. Morgan, Lewis, & Bockius, 516 So.2d 1011, 1011-12 (Fla.Dist. Ct.App.1987); Leventhal v. Dockser, 361 Mass. 894, 894, 282 N.E.2d 680, 681 4. The plaintiff's motion to proceed in form......
  • Fischer v. Estate of Flax
    • United States
    • D.C. Court of Appeals
    • January 30, 2003
    ...an amount ... equal to fifteen percent (15%) ... of the Company's authorized and issued stock.... 3. See, e.g., Bass v. Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, 516 So.2d 1011 (Fla.Ct.App.1987); Myers v. Cohen, 5 Haw.App. 232, 687 P.2d 6, rev'd on other grounds, 67 Haw. 389, 688 P.2d 1145 (1984); Leventhal......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • The Unwilling Donor
    • United States
    • University of Washington School of Law University of Washington Law Review No. 90-4, June 2021
    • Invalid date
    ...only if there is proof of damages, a difficult hurdle given that campaign contributions can easily be refunded. Compare Bass v. Morgan, 516 So. 2d 1011 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987), with Fuhrman v. Cal. Satellite Sys., 231 Cal. Rptr. 113 (Ct. App. 1986). Notwithstanding the different burdens ......
  • Extortion: what your client wants.
    • United States
    • Florida Bar Journal Vol. 83 No. 6, June 2009
    • June 1, 2009
    ...Gordon v. Gordon, 625 So. 2d 59 (Fla. 4th D.C.A. 1993). (3) Cooper v. Austin, 750 So. 2d 711 (5th D.C.A. 2000). (4) Bass v. Morgan, 516 So. 2d 1011 (Fla. 3d D.C.A. William H. Stolberg has been in the private practice of law since 1973 in Ft. Lauderdale, practicing exclusively in the area of......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT