Bass v. State

Decision Date11 January 1968
Docket NumberNo. 3,No. 43267,43267,3
CitationBass v. State, 159 S.E.2d 299, 117 Ga.App. 89 (Ga. App. 1968)
PartiesWalter L. BASS v. The STATE
CourtGeorgia Court of Appeals

Edward F. Taylor, Adams, O'Neal, Steele, Thornton & Hemingway, H. T. O'Neal, Jr., Macon, for appellant.

Clarence H. Clay, Jr., Sol., Tommy C. Mann, Macon, for appellee.

Syllabus Opinion by the Court

PANNELL, Judge.

The defendant was tried and convicted of violating the State Alcoholic Control Act by reason of his having and possessing non-tax-paid whiskey. His motion for new trial was overruled and he appeals to this court. The notice of appeal instructs the clerk to omit the 'transcript of the evidence produced on the trial of the case' but requested the clerk to include 'the transcript of the evidence adduced on the hearing of appellant's motion to suppress evidence.' In his brief in this court, the appellant abandons his enumeration of error that the verdict was contrary to the evidence, etc., and relies solely on the enumeration of error complaining of the overruling of his motion to suppress evidence.

Held:

Assuming, without deciding, that the overruling of the motion to suppress was error, it would be necessary to examine and consider the remainder of the transcript of evidence and proceedings in order to determine that this evidence was actually introduced before the jury, and unless it was introduced before the...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
6 cases
  • Reid v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • September 17, 1973
    ...during an illegal search was tendered and admitted against the defendant, though properly and timely objected to. Bass v. State, 117 Ga.App. 89, 90, 159 S.E.2d 299. Code Ann. § 27-313 provides: '(a) A defendant aggrieved by an unlawful search and seizure may move the court for the return of......
  • Childers v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • January 9, 1974
    ...it has been admitted without objection. (Cits.)' Holmes v. Burkett, 98 Ga.App. 189, 191, 105 S.E.2d 236, 239. See also Bass v. State, 117 Ga.App. 89, 159 S.E.2d 299; Cook v. State, 116 Ga.App. 304, 305, 157 S.E.2d 160; and Baker v. State, 230 Ga. 741, 742, 199 S.E.2d 2. Defendant contends t......
  • Pittman v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • July 6, 2007
    ...to the alleged error in not suppressing the evidence." (Punctuation omitted.) Pierson, supra, 199 Ga.App. at 634-635, 406 S.E.2d 578. See Bass v. State.10 See also Gilliam v. State;11 Stephens, supra, 119 Ga.App. at 674, 168 S.E.2d 333. Judgment affirmed. RUFFIN and BERNES, JJ., concur. 1. ......
  • Smith v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • September 24, 1974
    ...into evidence. Walker v. State, 130 Ga.App. 597, 203 S.E.2d 890; Reid v. State, 129 Ga.App. 660, 200 S.E.2d 456; Bass v. State, 117 Ga.App. 89, 159 S.E.2d 299. It would not have been 'reversible error until and unless evidence seized during an illegal search was tendered and admitted agains......
  • Get Started for Free