Bates v. McDonough, 21-0642
Decision Date | 23 August 2021 |
Docket Number | 21-0642 |
Parties | WILLIAM E. BATES, Appellant, v. DENIS MCDONOUGH, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Appellee. |
Court | United States Court of Appeals For Veterans Claims |
AMANDA M. RADKE Senior Appellate Attorney Office of General Counsel (O27M) U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
Pursuant to U.S. Vet.App. Rules (R.) 27 and 42, Appellant and Appellee hereby agree to and move for termination of the captioned appeal. The terms upon which the parties agree this appeal is to be terminated are contained in the attached Stipulated Agreement.
The Court has held that when the parties enter into such an agreement, it moots the case or controversy. Bond v Derwinski, 2 Vet.App. 376 (1992). See also Kimberly-Clark v. Proctor & Gamble, 973 F.2d 911, 914 (Fed. Cir. 1992) (); cf. 38 C.F.R. § 14.500(a), (c), (d). The General Counsel represents the Secretary of Veterans Affairs before the Court. 38 U.S.C. § 7263(a). In entering into this settlement agreement, the General Counsel is following well-established principles regarding the Government attorney's authority to terminate lawsuits by settlement or compromise, which principles date back well over a century. Compare Freeport-McMoRan Oil & Gas Co. v. FERC, 962 F.2d 45, 47 (D.C. Cir. 1992) ("[G]overnment attorneys [should] settle cases whenever possible.") (citing Executive Order on Civil Justice Reform, [Exec. Order No. 12,778, 3 C.F.R. § 359 (1991), reprinted in 28 U.S.C.S. § 519 (1992)]) with 2 Op. A.G. 482, 486 (1831).[1] See also Executive Order on Civil Justice Reform, Exec. Order 12,988, 61 Fed. Reg. 4729 (Feb. 7, 1996); Stone v. Bank of Commerce, 174 U.S. 412 (1899); Campbell v. United States, 19 Ct. CI. 426, 429 (1884). The parties have resolved, to their mutual satisfaction, the issues presented by this appeal and aver that (1) their agreement does not conflict with prior precedent decisions of the Court; (2) this is not a confession of error by the Secretary; and (3) this agreement disposes of the case on appeal.
WHEREFORE, the parties jointly move the Court for an order terminating the captioned appeal pursuant to Rule 42 of the Court's Rules of Practice and Procedure.
WHEREAS, William E. Bates (Appellant) filed an appeal to the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims on February 1, 2021, from an October 6, 2020, letter by the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board or BVA), declining to docket his appeal under the Appeals Modernization Act (AMA) system and instructing Appellant to file a notice of disagreement under the legacy appeal system; and
WHEREAS, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs (Appellee) and Appellant have reached a mutually satisfactory resolution of this litigation;
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises contained herein, the parties hereby agree as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial