Bates v. State
Decision Date | 05 November 1898 |
Citation | 24 So. 448,118 Ala. 102 |
Parties | BATES v. STATE. |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Appeal from city court of Selma; J. W. Mabry, Judge.
Jonas Bates was convicted of murder in the second degree, and appealed. Reversed.
The appellant, Jonas Bates, was indicted, and tried for the murder of one Henry Randall, was convicted of murder in the second degree, and sentenced to the penitentiary for 99 years.
Upon the cause being called for trial, the defendant moved to quash the indictment upon the following ground:
To this motion the state demurred upon the following grounds: (1) That said motion fails to show that the grand jury which found said indictment was not drawn in the presence of the officers designated by law. (2) That it does not appear from said motion that the grand jury which found said indictment was not drawn by the jury commissioners of Dallas county as required by law. (3) It appears from the motion that the grand jury was drawn in accordance with the statute in such cases made and provided. This demurrer was sustained and the defendant excepted. Thereupon the defendant filed a plea in abatement upon the same grounds as his motion to quash the indictment was based. To this plea the state demurred and assigned as grounds of demurrer the same as were assigned to the motion to quash the indictment. This demurrer was sustained and the defendant duly excepted. The defendant filed a motion to quash the venire upon the same grounds, and the demurrer assigning the same grounds was sustained to this motion. To this ruling the defendant duly excepted. These rulings present the only questions reviewed on the present appeal.
George H. Craig and A. L. McLeod, for appellant.
Wm. C Fitts, Atty. Gen., for the State.
The first section of the act of February 14, 1885 (Acts 1884-85, p. 492), provides,
On the 24th February, 1887 (Acts 1886-87, p. 209), the legislature passed another act amendatory of this act, entitled "An act, to amend an act to regulate the drawing and impaneling of grand and petit juries in Dallas county, approved Feb'y 14th, 1885," the first section of which reads ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Hart v. Backstrom
... ... 3 ... STATUTES. Statute dispensing with requirement of another ... statute that lists of land struck off to state for taxes ... should be filed with land commissioner amends it by ... implication and does not violate constitutional provision ... that law ... 532, 40 P ... 926; In re Ashby, 60 Kan. 101, 55 P. 336; 26 A. & E ... Encycl. of L. 709." ... [148 ... Miss. 49] In Bates v. State, 118 Ala. 102, ... 24 So. 448, the supreme court of Alabama, in discussing the ... effect of similar constitutional provisions in that ... ...
-
Windham v. State
...shall be clearly expressed in its title. This provision must receive a reasonable construction, so as to give it effect. Bates v. State, 118 Ala. 102, 24 So. 448; v. Rogers, 107 Ala. 444, 19 So. 909, 32 L.R.A. 520. If the subject is expressed in general terms, everything necessary to make a......
-
State ex rel. Howard v. Cole, 7 Div. 425
...v. Cargile, 138 Ala. 164, 35 So. 114; Thomas v. State, 124 Ala. 48, 54, 27 So. 315; Cobb v. Vary, 120 Ala. 263, 24 So. 442; Bates v. State, 118 Ala. 102, 24 So. 448; Birmingham Union Ry. Co. v. Elyton Land Co., 114 Ala. 70, 21 So. 314; Ex parte Thomas, 113 Ala. 1, 6, 21 So. 369; State ex re......
-
State v. Hubbard
... ... the provisions of the other statutes on the same subject, ... there appearing in more enlarged and extended form." ... See, also, Sisk v. Cargile, 138 Ala. 164, 35 So ... 114; Thomas v. State, 124 Ala. 54, 27 So. 315; ... Cobb v. Vary, 120 Ala. 263, 24 So. 442; Bates v ... State, 118 Ala. 102, 24 So. 448; B. U. Ry. Co. v ... Elyton Land Co., 114 Ala. 70, 21 So. 314; Ex parte ... Thomas, 113 Ala. 1, 6, 21 So. 369; State ex rel. v ... Rogers, 107 Ala. 444, 19 So. 909, 32 L. R. A. 520; ... Gandy v. State, 86 Ala. 20, 5 So. 420; Falconer ... v. Robinson, ... ...