Batizi v. State

Decision Date12 April 2019
Docket NumberCase No. 5D18-2172
Citation268 So.3d 235 (Mem)
Parties Gregory J. BATIZI, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

268 So.3d 235 (Mem)

Gregory J. BATIZI, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-2172

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed April 12, 2019


James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Glendon G. Gordon, Jr., Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kaylee D. Tatman, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM

We affirm this Anders 1 appeal in all respects. However, we note that the judgment contains a scrivener's error where it states that Appellant's sex offender probation for count nine is for a period of eight years following the prison term. This conflicts with the oral pronouncement that the sentence for count nine (a third-degree felony) was two years of prison followed by three years of sex offender probation. Thus, we remand this case for correction of the scrivener's error on the judgment and sentence. See, e.g., Downey v. State, 114 So.3d 356 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013) (affirming an Anders appeal but remanding for correction of scrivener's errors).

AFFIRMED AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

LAMBERT, GROSSHANS and SASSO, JJ., concur.

--------

Notes:

1 Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).

--------

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Berben v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • April 12, 2019
    ...268 So.3d 235Jesse Graham BERBEN, Appellant,v.STATE of Florida, Appellee.Case No. 5D17-1428District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.Opinion filed April 12, 2019Michael Ufferman, of Michael Ufferman Law Firm, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellant.Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallaha......
  • Rish v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • April 12, 2019
    ...that (1) he or she would have accepted the offer had counsel advised the defendant correctly, (2) the prosecutor would not have withdrawn 268 So.3d 235the offer, (3) the court would have accepted the offer, and (4) the conviction or sentence, or both, under the offer's terms would have been......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT