Batizi v. State
Decision Date | 12 April 2019 |
Docket Number | Case No. 5D18-2172 |
Citation | 268 So.3d 235 (Mem) |
Parties | Gregory J. BATIZI, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
268 So.3d 235 (Mem)
Gregory J. BATIZI, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Case No. 5D18-2172
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Opinion filed April 12, 2019
James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Glendon G. Gordon, Jr., Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kaylee D. Tatman, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM
We affirm this Anders 1 appeal in all respects. However, we note that the judgment contains a scrivener's error where it states that Appellant's sex offender probation for count nine is for a period of eight years following the prison term. This conflicts with the oral pronouncement that the sentence for count nine (a third-degree felony) was two years of prison followed by three years of sex offender probation. Thus, we remand this case for correction of the scrivener's error on the judgment and sentence. See, e.g., Downey v. State, 114 So.3d 356 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013) (affirming an Anders appeal but remanding for correction of scrivener's errors).
AFFIRMED AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.
LAMBERT, GROSSHANS and SASSO, JJ., concur.
--------
Notes:
1 Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).
--------
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Berben v. State
...268 So.3d 235Jesse Graham BERBEN, Appellant,v.STATE of Florida, Appellee.Case No. 5D17-1428District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.Opinion filed April 12, 2019Michael Ufferman, of Michael Ufferman Law Firm, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellant.Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallaha......
-
Rish v. State
...that (1) he or she would have accepted the offer had counsel advised the defendant correctly, (2) the prosecutor would not have withdrawn 268 So.3d 235the offer, (3) the court would have accepted the offer, and (4) the conviction or sentence, or both, under the offer's terms would have been......