Bd. of Educ. of the Yonkers City Sch. Dist. v. Yonkers Fed'n of Teachers

Decision Date26 February 2020
Docket Number2018–05550,Index No. 70022/17
Citation180 A.D.3d 1041,119 N.Y.S.3d 209
Parties In the Matter of BOARD OF EDUCATION OF the YONKERS CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT, Appellant, v. YONKERS FEDERATION OF TEACHERS, Respondent.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Spolzino Smith Buss & Jacobs, LLP, White Plains, N.Y. (Robert A. Spolzino, Joanna M. Topping, Jacob E. Amir, and Nancy Durand of counsel), for appellant.

Robert T. Reilly, Latham, N.Y. (Christopher R. Scoville and Michael J. Del Piano of counsel), for respondent.

RUTH C. BALKIN, J.P., COLLEEN D. DUFFY, FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, ANGELA G. IANNACCI, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

In a hybrid proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to permanently stay arbitration and action for declaratory relief, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Terry Jane Ruderman, J.), dated April 24, 2018. The order denied the petition and granted the motion of the Yonkers Federation of Teachers to compel arbitration.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The petitioner, the Board of Education of the Yonkers City School District (hereinafter the Board), and the respondent, Yonkers Federation of Teachers (hereinafter the YFT), are parties to a collective bargaining agreement (hereinafter the CBA). In 2017, the YFT filed a grievance alleging, inter alia, that the Board was in violation of the CBA by failing to enforce a parking space assignment agreement between the YFT and the Civil Service Employees Association.

After the grievance was denied, and after a failed attempt at mediation between the parties, the YFT demanded arbitration. The Board thereafter commenced this hybrid proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to permanently stay arbitration and action for declaratory relief, and the YFT moved to compel arbitration. The Supreme Court denied the petition and granted the motion. We affirm.

"Public policy in New York favors arbitral resolution of public sector labor disputes" ( Matter of City of Yonkers v. Yonkers Fire Fighters, Local 628, IAFF, AFL–CIO, 153 A.D.3d 617, 617, 60 N.Y.S.3d 244 ; see Matter of City of Long Beach v. Civil Serv. Empls. Assn., Inc.-Long Beach Unit, 8 N.Y.3d 465, 470, 835 N.Y.S.2d 538, 867 N.E.2d 389 ; Matter of Professional, Clerical, Tech. Empls. Assn. [Buffalo Bd. of Educ.], 90 N.Y.2d 364, 372, 660 N.Y.S.2d 827, 683 N.E.2d 733 ). "However, a dispute between a public sector employer and an employee is only arbitrable if it satisfies a two-prong test" ( Matter of City of Yonkers v. Yonkers Fire Fighters, Local 628, IAFF, AFL–CIO, 153 A.D.3d at 617–618, 60 N.Y.S.3d 244 ; see Matter of County of Rockland v. Correction Officers Benevolent Assn. of Rockland County, Inc., 126 A.D.3d 694, 695, 5 N.Y.S.3d 197 ; Matter of Board of Educ. of Deer Park Union Free School Dist. v. Deer Park Teachers' Assn., 77 A.D.3d 747, 747–748, 909 N.Y.S.2d 738 ).

First, the court must determine whether there is any statutory, constitutional, or public policy prohibition against arbitrating the grievance (see Locust Val. Cent. Sch. Dist. v. Benstock, 144 A.D.3d 758, 41 N.Y.S.3d 241, citing Matter of County of Rockland v. Correction Officers Benevolent Assn. of Rockland County, Inc., 126 A.D.3d at 695, 5 N.Y.S.3d 197 ; Matter of Board of Educ. of Deer Park Union Free School Dist. v. Deer Park Teachers' Assn., 77 A.D.3d at 748, 909 N.Y.S.2d 738 ). "If there is no prohibition against the arbitration, the court must determine whether the parties agreed to arbitrate the particular dispute by examining their collective bargaining agreement" ( Matter of Incorporated Vil. of Floral Park v. Floral Park Police Benevolent Assn., 131 A.D.3d 1240, 1241, 17 N.Y.S.3d 463 ; see Matter of County of Rockland v. Correction Officers Benevolent Assn. of Rockland County, Inc., 126 A.D.3d at 695, 5 N.Y.S.3d 197, citing Matter of Board of Educ. of Deer Park Union Free School Dist. v. Deer Park Teachers' Assn., 77 A.D.3d at 748, 909 N.Y.S.2d 738 ). Here, the Board does not assert that arbitration of the YFT's grievance is prohibited by law or public policy.

"In analyzing whether the parties in fact agreed to arbitrate the particular dispute, a court ‘is merely to...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Teamsters Local 445 v. Town of Monroe
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • November 12, 2020
    ...examining their collective bargaining agreement" ( Matter of Board of Educ. of the Yonkers City Sch. Dist. v. Yonkers Fedn. of Teachers, 180 A.D.3d 1041, 1042, 119 N.Y.S.3d 209 [citations and internal quotation marks omitted]; see Matter of County of Chautauqua v. Civil Serv. Empls. Assn., ......
  • Bd. of Educ. v. Yonkers Fed'n of Teachers
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • November 12, 2020
    ...provision of the CBA at issue here is broad (see Matter of Board of Educ. of the Yonkers City School Dist. v. Yonkers Fedn. of Teachers, 180 A.D.3d 1041, 1043, 119 N.Y.S.3d 209 [listing cases] ). Moreover, we find that there is a reasonable relationship between the subject matter of the dis......
  • Cnty. of Nassau v. Detectives Ass'n, Inc. of the Police Dep't of Nassau Cnty.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • November 18, 2020
    ...resolution of public sector labor disputes" ( Matter of Board of Educ. of the Yonkers City Sch. Dist. v. Yonkers Fedn. of Teachers, 180 A.D.3d 1041, 1042, 119 N.Y.S.3d 209 [internal quotation marks omitted]). "However, a dispute between a public sector employer and an employee is only arbit......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT