Beach v. Kunken

Decision Date26 February 1996
Citation224 A.D.2d 684,638 N.Y.S.2d 917
PartiesIn the Matter of Matthew J. BEACH, Appellant, v. Stephen KUNKEN, et al., Respondents.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Raskin, Haas & Poli, Huntington (John G. Poli, III, of counsel), for appellant.

Cahn Wishod & Lamb, L.L.P., Melville (Richard C. Cahn and Eugene R. Barnosky, of counsel), for respondents Stephen Kunken and Andrew W. Lawrence, Jr.

James M. Catterson, Jr., District Attorney, Riverhead (Ronald E. Lipetz, of counsel), respondent pro se.

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to prohibit the respondents from proceeding with the prosecution of the petitioner on the ground that the crime of driving while intoxicated as a misdemeanor cannot be prosecuted in a Village Justice Court, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Oshrin, J.), dated September 13, 1994, which dismissed the proceeding (Matter of Beach v. Kunken, 162 Misc.2d 381, 616 N.Y.S.2d 721).

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

After the judgment appealed from was issued, upon the petitioner's application the matter was transferred to the First District Court of Suffolk County. Accordingly, the instant appeal is academic.

SANTUCCI, J.P., and KRAUSMAN, GOLDSTEIN and FLORIO, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • Borell v. Merola
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 26 Febrero 1996

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT