Beach v. Lynn
Decision Date | 08 June 1923 |
Docket Number | No. 23185,23185 |
Citation | 299 Mo. 127,252 S.W. 437 |
Parties | BEACH v. LYNN et al. |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Saline County; Samuel Davis, Judge.
Action by W. H. Beach against Thomas Lynn and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.
L. D. Tolle, of Kansas City, for appellant. Davis & Woodruff, of Kansas City, for respondents.
Action to quiet title. The petition is in an ordinary form for such a case, and involves 80 acres of land in Saline county. Defendant Lynn, although personally served, filed no answer, and as to him judgment was by default. Lee S. Parish, the widow of one Lafayette H. Parish (called L. H. Parish), filed answer in which she alleged that this land was acquired by her husband (now deceased) during their married life, and that she was entitled to a dower interest therein. She avers that her said husband, upon the acquisition of the land, caused the bare legal title to be placed in the name of one F. B. Simmons, and that the said Simmons claimed no actual or beneficial right, title, or interest therein, but held the legal title thereto to the use and benefit of the said Lafayette H. Parish. The answer then further proceeds in this language:
The widow, as the administratrix of her husband's estate, filed an answer, by which the same issues, among others, were raised. Defendant Phillip Simpson Parish, through William T. Bellamy, guardian ad litem, filed the usual answer. Replies placed all new matters in the answer in issue. The trial court entered of record the following findings of fact and judgment:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Lee & Boutell Co. v. Brockett Cement Co.
...in warranty deed. (b) Provision in deed of trust. Black v. Banks, 37 S.W. (2d) 598; Mahen v. Tavern Rock, 37 S.W. (2d) 562; Beach v. Lynn, 252 S.W. 441. (5) Appellants Rosenzweig were not holders in due course of the $15,000 first mortgage notes. Sec. 2680, R.S. 1929; Beach v. Lynn, 252 S.W......
-
Hetzler v. Millard
...and their predecessors in title. Marshall v. Hill, 246 Mo. 1; Gross v. Watts, 206 Mo. 373; Sicher v. Rambousek, 193 Mo. 113; Beach v. Lynn, 299 Mo. 127; Caruthersville v. Huffman, 262 Mo. 367; St. Louis v. Koch, 335 Mo. 991; K.C. & Northern Railroad Co. v. Baker, 183 Mo. 312; Bacon v. Onset......
- Radler v. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co.
-
Moore v. Carter
... ... of the owners. 65 C.J. 740, sec. 606. (8) Parks Carter was ... not a bona fide purchaser for value. Beach v. Lynn, ... 299 Mo. 127, 252 S.W. 437. (9) Even if Will H. Hargus ... represented Anna Carter as well as Parks Carter in the ... repurchase of ... ...