Beach v. Sweeney
| Decision Date | 23 April 1958 |
| Docket Number | No. 35193,35193 |
| Citation | 150 N.E.2d 42,167 Ohio St. 477 |
| Parties | , 5 O.O.2d 157 BEACH et al., Appellees, v. SWEENEY et al., Appellants. |
| Court | Ohio Supreme Court |
W. T. Reed, Waverly, for appellants.
Wray Bevens, Waverly, for appellees.
There being no bill of exceptions filed or allowed by the Court of Appeals in which the case was heard de novo, this court cannot say that there was no substantial evidence warranting the Court of Appeals in reaching the conclusion it did. On appeal on questions of law all reasonable presumptions consistent with the record will be indulged in favor of the validity of the judgment under review and of the regularity and legality of the proceedings below.
The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
72 cases
-
State Of Ohio v. Lewers
...abused that discretion which resulted in prejudice to the defense, the regularity of the proceedings is presumed. Beach v. Sweeney (1958), 167 Ohio St. 477, 150 N.E.2d 42. See also, State v. Shields (1984), 15 Ohio App.3d 112, 472 N.E.2d 1110. {¶85} In Remmer, the Supreme Court held that wh......
-
State Of Ohio v. Brenson
...abused that discretion which resulted in prejudice to the defense, the regularity of the proceedings is presumed. Beach v. Sweeney (1958), 167 Ohio St. 477, 150 N.E.2d 42. See also, State v. Shields (1984), 15 Ohio App.3d 112, 472 N.E.2d 1110. {¶158} The test for prospective jurors is not w......
-
City of Cleveland v. Whipkey
... ... Ford v. Ideal Aluminum, Inc. [278 N.E.2d 381] (1966), 7 Ohio St.2d 9, 218 N.E.2d 434; Beach v. Sweeney (1958), 167 Ohio St. 477, 150 N.E.2d 42; Makranczy v. Gelfand (1924), 109 Ohio St. 325, 142 N.E. 688 ... However, when ... ...
-
State v. Lake, 2010 Ohio 1113 (Ohio App. 3/18/2010)
...abused that discretion which resulted in prejudice to the defense, the regularity of the proceedings is presumed. Beach v. Sweeney (1958), 167 Ohio St. 477, 150 N.E.2d 42. See also, State v. Shields (1984), 15 Ohio App.3d 112, 472 N.E.2d {¶75} Obviously, body language and facial expressions......
Request a trial to view additional results