Beale v. Old Colony St. Ry. Co.
Decision Date | 20 June 1907 |
Citation | 81 N.E. 867,196 Mass. 119 |
Parties | BEALE v. OLD COLONY ST. RY. CO. |
Court | United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court |
J. W. McAnarney, for plaintiff.
Reginald Foster, William D. Turner, and George Hoague, for defendant.
This is an action of tort to recover for the death of the plaintiff's intestate, Earl R. Beale. It is unnecessary to determine whether it is brought under Rev. Laws, c. 171, § 2, or under Rev. Laws, c. 111, § 267. The plaintiff's intestate, on August 27, 1904, was a child seven years and six weeks old, above the average intelligence, and was struck and killed by a car of the defendant on Washington street in Quincy. The tracks of the defendant at the place of the death were on the westerly side of the street and the westerly rail thereof was distant from the nearest edge of the sidewalk about 2 or 3 feet. There was a single track in this portion of the street and the car was proceeding from the direction of Weymouth, northerly toward Boston. Some distance south of where the accident occurred, Foster street joins Washington street on its westerly side, and near the place of the accident a street, called Maple Place, also enters Washington street on its westerly side. On the northwesterly corner of Maple Place and Washington street there was a vacantlot, from which a house had been moved, and there was a house on the adjacent lot northerly bounding on Washington street. The Public Library was nearly opposite the place of the accident. There was evidence tending to show that at the time of the accident there was a high board fence and tall lilac bushes at the junction of Foster and Washington streets, and that extending northerly toward the place of the accident, on land on the westerly side of the street next to the track, there were other bushes and shrubs 10 feet high and, leaning out over the sidewalk. These extended part way to the place of the accident and from there on to the place of the accident there was a growth of maple trees 30 feet apart, extending along the westerly side of Washington street close to the edge of the sidewalk; that the cars of the defendant usually moved slowly over that portion of Washington street lying between Foster street and the place of the accident and at the corner of Foster and Washington streets there was a stop signal that it would be next to impossible for a person entering Washington street from Maple Place to see a car approaching from the south on account of the trees along that side of the street, an old board fence and a hedge; that the child was familiar with the manner in which the cars were operated along this portion of Washington street, and that this portion of the street was a residential section with dwelling houses on both sides. There was evidence from a passenger riding on the front seat of the car of the defendant, which caused the death, that Another passenger testified that the motorman, after seeing the women, ...
To continue reading
Request your trial