Beale v. Yepes

Citation766 N.Y.S.2d 364,309 A.D.2d 886
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
Decision Date27 October 2003
PartiesEUGENE BEALE et al., Appellants,<BR>v.<BR>JOSE M. YEPES et al., Respondents.

Altman, J.P., S. Miller, McGinity, Adams and Mastro, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

To vacate a default, a plaintiff must demonstrate both a reasonable excuse for the default and a meritorious cause of action (see CPLR 5015 [a]; Sicari v Hung Yuen Wong, 286 AD2d 489 [2001]). The plaintiffs' counsel's bare allegations of law office failure on the part of prior counsel cannot serve as the basis to set aside a judgment pursuant to CPLR 5015 (see Gourdet v Hershfeld, 277 AD2d 422 [2000]; Eretz Funding v Shalosh Assoc., 266 AD2d 184 [1999]; Spatz v Bajramoski, 214 AD2d 436 [1995]; Blackman v Blackman, 131 AD2d 801, 805 [1987]). Furthermore, the plaintiffs failed to submit any evidence sufficient to satisfy the serious injury threshold set forth in Insurance Law § 5102 (d) (see Sarot v Yusufov, 301 AD2d 512 [2003]; Waaland v Weiss, 228 AD2d 435 [1996]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the motion to vacate.

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Heidari v. First Advance Funding Corp., 2007 NY Slip Op 32895(U) (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 8/21/2007), 0004878/2007
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • August 21, 2007
    ...of a meritorious defense. Lopez v. Tierney & Courtney Overhead Door Sales Co., Inc., 8 A.D.3d 347 (2nd Dept. 2004); Beale v. Yepes, 309 A.D.2d 886, 887 (2nd Dept. 2003). The determination of what constitutes a reasonable excuse is left to the sound discretion of the court (see, Scarlett v. ......
  • Torres v. Rely on US, Inc.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • October 3, 2018
    ...A.D.3d 801, 61 N.Y.S.3d 104 ; Carillon Nursing & Rehabilitation Ctr., LLP v. Fox, 118 A.D.3d 933, 934, 989 N.Y.S.2d 68 ; Beale v. Yepes, 309 A.D.2d 886, 766 N.Y.S.2d 364 ).Since ROU failed to establish a reasonable excuse for its default in appearing or answering the complaint, it is unnece......
  • GMAC Mortgage Corporation v. Jackson, 2007 NY Slip Op 30227(U) (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 3/12/2007)
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • March 12, 2007
    ...cause of action (see Lopez v. Tierney & Courtney Overhead Door Sales Co., Inc., 8 A.D.3d 347 [2d Dept. 2004];_ Beale v. Yepes, 309 A.D.2d 886, 887 [2d Dept. 2003]). The determination of what constitutes a reasonable excuse is left to the sound discretion of the court (see, Scarlett v. McCar......
  • Wei Hong Hu v. Sadiqi
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • April 12, 2011
    ...214 A.D.2d 436, 436, 624 N.Y.S.2d 606; see also Huggins v. Parkset Supply, Ltd., 24 A.D.3d 610, 611, 807 N.Y.S.2d 112; Beale v. Yepes, 309 A.D.2d 886, 766 N.Y.S.2d 364) and, in any event, the record contains no evidence that the tenants' new attorney attempted to review the status of the ca......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT