Beamer v. Waddell, 27728.

Decision Date29 March 1943
Docket NumberNo. 27728.,27728.
Citation47 N.E.2d 608,221 Ind. 279
PartiesBEAMER, Atty. Gen., v. WADDELL.
CourtIndiana Supreme Court

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Original proceeding by George N. Beamer, as Attorney General of the State of Indiana, against William B. Waddell for disbarment.

Defendant disbarred.

See, also, Ind.Sup., 45 N.E.2d 1020.George N. Beamer, Atty. Gen., Glen L. Steckley, Deputy Atty. Gen., and Walter O. Lewis, Deputy Atty. Gen., for George N. Beamer, informant.

Edward C. Eikman, of Indianapolis, for William B. Waddell.

SHAKE, Judge.

This proceeding was instituted by the Attorney General of Indiana By leave of court. The information charges that the defendant, a member of the Bar of this state: (1) counseled and maintained in the courts unlawful and unjust actions and proceedings; (2) solicited employment as an attorney for the purpose of instituting and prosecuting such actions; and, (3) failed to account for and pay over moneys belonging to his clients which he collected for them in the capacity of an arrorney at law.

The bill of particulars set out in said information charges the defendant with a course of reprehensible conduct extending over several years. It is alleged that he went about the state searching the records in the offices of the clerks of the various courts for unclaimed or undisbursed moneys on deposit therein. With this information, he sought out persons entitled to these funds and by various false representations prevailed upon them to give him powers of attorney, authorizing him to collect the same on their behalf. In other instances, he collected such funds by procuring himself to be appointed guardian or administrator of the estates of such persons. Nine such transactions are disclosed in which the defendant collected funds which he appropriated to his own use and for which he made no accounting. Among the victims were four (4) insane persons confined in state institutions, the estate of a Civil War veteran who died in the soldier's home, an aged woman, an invalid, and a minor.

Upon the filing of the information we ordered notice to the defendant. He appeared specially by counsel and challenged the jurisdiction of this court. That issue was decided against him on January 23, 1943. At the same time we ordered the defendant to answer within fifteen (15) days. Beamer, Attorney General v. Waddell, 1943, Ind.Sup., 45 N.E.2d 1020. Subsequently, on the defendant's petition, stating that his answer would be upon the merits, the time was extended...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT