Bean v. State

Decision Date19 October 1887
CitationBean v. State, 5 S.W. 525, 24 Tex.App. 11 (Tex. App. 1887)
CourtTexas Court of Appeals
PartiesBEAN <I>alias</I> WHITE v. STATE.

Appeal from district court, McLennan county; EUGENE WILLIAMS, Judge.

This conviction was for the larceny of a mare, and the penalty assessed against the appellant was a term of five years in the penitentiary.

Jenkins & Jenkins and Clark, Dyer & Bolinger, for appellant. Asst. Atty. Gen. Davidson, for the State.

WILLSON, J.

About September 10, 1885, William Little's mare was stolen from him in Bell county, Texas. Eleven months thereafter, to-wit, about August 27, 1886, she was in the possession of the defendant, in McLennan county, who then and there, under the name of White, traded her to one Turner. The above recited circumstances constitute the evidence upon which this conviction is founded. There is not another particle of criminative evidence in the record before us. On the contrary, the state, by one of her own witnesses, proved that in August, 1886, the defendant purchased said mare, and the testimony of this witness went before the jury uncontradicted by any other evidence adduced on the trial.

As presented to us the conviction is unsupported by the evidence. Defendant's possession of the mare cannot be said to be recent, and can therefore, at most, afford but slight ground for the presumption of guilt against him. His possession,...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
4 cases
  • State v. Moore
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 16 Junio 1890
    ... ... doubt be raised in the minds of the jury by the ... defendant's explanation of his possession of recently ... stolen property. If the explanation is reasonable in itself, ... then the state must, in some other way, contradict the ... explanation, or the jury must acquit. Bean v. State, ... 5 S.W. 525; State v. Warden, 94 Mo. 648; Smith ... v. State, 6 S.W. 40; Young v. State, 3 South ... Rep. 881; State v. Manley, 38 N.W. 415; Greenl ... Ev., sec. 32; People v. Flyn, 15 P. 102. (6) The ... court's seventh instruction should not have been given so ... ...
  • Tibbs v. State
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • 17 Julio 2003
  • Sutherlin v. State
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
    • 19 Diciembre 1984
    ...of law. Yates v. State, 37 Tex.Rep. 202 (Tex.Sup.Ct.1873); Bragg v. State, 17 Tex.App. 219 (Tex.Ct.App.1884); Bean v. State, 24 Tex.App. 11, 5 S.W. 525 (Tex.Ct.App.1887); Menchaca v. State, 58 Tex.Cr.R. 198, 125 S.W. 20 (Tex.Cr.App.1910); Preston v. State, 178 S.W.2d 522 In this instance, b......
  • Preston v. State
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
    • 8 Marzo 1944
    ...v. State, 37 Tex. 202 (Bed-clothing— five months); Bragg v. State, 17 Tex.App. 219, 221 (Horse—five and one-half months); Bean v. State, 24 Tex.App. 11, 5 S.W. 525 (Mare—eleven months); Tolliver v. State, 25 Tex.App. 600, 8 S.W. 806 (Coat—one year); Flores v. State, 26 Tex.App. 477, 9 S.W. ......