Beard v. Beard, s. 39234
| Decision Date | 04 January 1983 |
| Docket Number | 39235,Nos. 39234,s. 39234 |
| Citation | 298 S.E.2d 495,250 Ga. 449 |
| Parties | BEARD v. BEARD. (Two cases) |
| Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
William H. Major, Atlanta, for Donna W. Beard.
Sanford R. Karesh, Thomas S. Bentley, Edwin A. Tate, Barwick, Bentley, Karesh & Seacrest, Atlanta, for Larry S. Beard.
We granted applications for discretionary appeal in order to determine whether the trial court was correct in its ruling that the express provisions of a settlement agreement between the parties constitute a waiver by the husband of a right to seek a downward modification of his child support obligation, under the test set out in Varn v. Varn, 242 Ga. 309, 311, 248 S.E.2d 667 (1978).
The agreement provides that the parties "expressly waive any and all rights that they may have under Georgia Code Annotated Section 30-220(a) to seek a revision of the Judicial Decree with respect to permanent alimony for Wife."
Varn holds as follows: "We therefore adopt the rule that the parties to an alimony agreement may obtain modification unless the agreement expressly waives the right of modification by referring specifically to that right; the right to modification will be waived by agreement of the parties only in very clear waiver language which refers to the right of modification." Id., at 311, 248 S.E.2d 667.
Plainly, the agreement constitutes a waiver by both parties of the right to seek modification with respect to permanent alimony for the wife. Nowhere therein, however, is any provision "in very clear waiver language which refers to the right of modification" of child support payments.
Accordingly, the interpretation of the trial court finding a waiver was not warranted by the terms of the agreement.
Judgments in Cases Nos. 39234 and 39235 affirmed in part; reversed in part.
All the Justices concur, except WELTNER, J., disqualified.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Nelson v. Mixon
...to petition for any modification of ... future alimony payments" constituted a waiver under Varn v. Varn, supra); and Beard v. Beard, 250 Ga. 449, 298 S.E.2d 495 (1983) (parties' waiver of "any and all rights that they may have under [OCGA § 19-6-19] to seek a revision of the Judicial Decre......
-
Carlos v. Lane, S02A1333.
...of alimony and specifically cites OCGA § 19-6-19. [Cit.]" Id. See Daniel v. Daniel, supra, 250 Ga. at 849(2). See also Beard v. Beard, 250 Ga. 449, 298 S.E.2d 495 (1983). Compare Nelson v. Mixon, 265 Ga. 441, 443(2), 457 S.E.2d 669 (1995) (waiver contained neither a specific reference to al......
-
Jones v. Jones
...in that term"). This distinction drawn between alimony for spousal support and alimony for child support reflects why Beard v. Beard, 250 Ga. 449, 298 S.E.2d 495 (1983), cited by appellee, fails to support his argument, because in that case the parties' waiver specified that it applied to "......
-
In re Bedingfield
...Nowhere in the Amendment is any provision which refers to the right of modification of child support payments. See Beard v. Beard, 250 Ga. 449, 298 S.E.2d 495 (1983). Moreover, since the right to petition for modification of child support is a right which belongs to the children involved an......
-
Domestic Relations - Barry B. Mcgough and Gregory R. Miller
...697 (1945); Rochester v. Rochester, 124 Ga. 993, 53 S.E. 399 (1906). 108. Jones, 280 Ga. at 716-17, 632 S.E.2d at 125; cf. Beard v. Beard, 250 Ga. 449, 449, 298 S.E.2d 495, 495 (1983) (waiver language expressly limited to "alimony for wife"). 109. Crowder v. Crowder, 281 Ga. 656, 642 S.E.2d......