Beaumont Petroleum Syndicate v. Broussard, 2532.
Decision Date | 07 November 1933 |
Docket Number | No. 2532.,2532. |
Citation | 64 S.W.2d 993 |
Parties | BEAUMONT PETROLEUM SYNDICATE et al. v. BROUSSARD et al. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from District Court, Jefferson County; J. D. Campbell, Judge.
Suit by J. E. Broussard and others, as trustees of the Broussard Trust, against the Beaumont Petroleum Syndicate and others, wherein a judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiffs, and the defendants filed an application for an injunction to restrain the execution sale under the Moratorium Law. From a judgment refusing the injunction, the defendants appeal.
Judgment reversed, and the cause remanded in accordance with opinion.
Oliver J. Todd, of Beaumont, for appellants.
A. D. Lipscomb, of Beaumont, for appellees.
O'QUINN, Justice.
This is an appeal from an order of the Sixtieth district court of Jefferson county refusing an injunction to restrain or postpone from sale certain lands in Jefferson county, Tex., under an execution issued out of said court by virtue of a judgment and foreclosure of a vendor's lien on said lands.
August 9, 1923, the City National Bank of Beaumont sold and conveyed five certain tracts of land situated in Jefferson county, Tex., comprising some 1,665 acres to the Beaumont Petroleum Syndicate, a Texas corporation, for a consideration of $40,000, of which $15,000 was paid, and said syndicate executed and delivered to said bank its five certain vendor lien notes, each in the sum of $5,000, dated August 9, 1923, numbered 1 to 5, and payable to the order of said bank in one, two, three, four, and five years, respectively, from the date of execution, said conveyance and said notes retaining the vendor's lien on the land to secure the payment of said notes. The notes provided that they should bear interest from date until maturity at the rate of 7 per cent. and, after maturity, if not paid when due, 8 per cent. interest on the principal and unpaid interest, and contained the usual 10 per cent. attorney's fee clause. The first two notes were duly paid. Notes 3 and 4 were not paid, and, by agreement, September 28, 1927, the dates of payment of said notes were advanced to August 9, 1928, the date upon which note No. 5 matured, thus making notes 3, 4, and 5 due on the same date. In said agreement the vendor's lien was expressly retained on the land. On September 21, 1928, the City National Bank, for a valuable consideration, by an instrument in writing assigned and transferred to J. E. Broussard said notes and lien. June 20, 1931, J. E. Broussard, by instrument in writing, assigned and transferred said notes and lien to the trustees of the Broussard Trust, a voluntary association composed of J. E. Broussard, C. E. Broussard, and J. E. Broussard, Jr. May 26, 1932, said trustees of said trust filed suit in the district court of Jefferson county, Sixtieth district, against said Petroleum Syndicate and its stockholders for judgment on said notes and foreclosure of the vendor's lien on said lands. In due course, judgment was rendered for plaintiffs, trustees of the Broussard Trust, in the sum of $19,172.96, for principal, interest, and attorney's fees, and foreclosing the vendor's lien. The land was advertised for sale under execution on said judgment, for July 4, 1933. Appellants, stockholders of said Beaumont Petroleum Syndicate, and defendants in the foreclosure suit, June 29, 1933, filed application with the Sixtieth district court in which the judgment of foreclosure had been rendered, for injunction to restrain said sale and to stay same for a period of 180 days, as provided by House Bill No. 231 (c. 102), enacted by the Forty-Third Legislature, known as the Texas Moratorium Law, and which became effective May 1, 1933 (Vernon's Ann. Civ. St. art. 2218b). Upon a hearing the injunction was refused, from which judgment this appeal was taken.
The provisions of said act thought to be material to the disposition of this case, are set out below:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
James v. Chapman
... ... Hughes, 174 Ind. 638, 92 ... N.E. 738; Beaumont Syndicate v. Broussard, 64 S.W.2d ... 993; Hanson v. Bank ... Court, 61 S.D. 356, 249 N.W. 631; Beaumont Petroleum ... Syndicate v. Broussard, (Tex. Civ. App.) 64 S.W.2d ... ...
-
Pratt v. Story
...City of Fort Worth v. Morrow, 284 S.W. 275 (Tex.Civ.App.--Fort Worth, 1926, writ ref'd); Beaumont Petroleum Syndicate v. Broussard, 64 S.W.2d 993 (Tex.Civ.App.--Beaumont, 1933, appeal dism'd); Regal Properties v. Donovitz, 479 S.W.2d 748 (Tex.Civ.App.--Dallas, 1972, writ ref'd, A remedial s......
-
Price Pfister v Moore & Kimmey Inc.
...contract, it must have been contracted for and agreed to by the parties in the contract itself." Beaumont Petroleum Syndicate v. Broussard, 64 S.W.2d 993, 997 (Tex. Civ. App.--Beaumont 1933), appeal dismissed as moot sub nom. Plainview Bldg. & Loan Ass'n v. Robbins, 123 Tex. 408, 73 S.W.2d ......