Beck & Gregg Hardware Co. v. Associated Transport, 18555
| Decision Date | 14 April 1954 |
| Docket Number | No. 18555,18555 |
| Citation | 81 S.E.2d 515,210 Ga. 545 |
| Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
| Parties | BECK & GREGG HARDWARE CO. v. ASSOCIATED TRANSPORT, Inc. |
Smith, Kilpatrick, Cody, Rogers & McClatchey, Atlanta, for plaintiff in error.
W. Colquitt Carter, Bryan, Carter, Ansley & Smith, Atlanta, for defendant in error.
Syllabus Opinion by the Court.
This mandamus proceeding was brought in Fulton County by Beck & Gregg Hardware Company, a private corporation, against Associated Transport, Inc., a common carrier which operates under a certificate of convenience and necessity issued to it by the Public Service Commission under and pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 68-6 of the Code of 1933. In substance, the petition alleges: The plaintiff operates a wholesale hardware business and is dependent on common carriers both for receipt and delivery of its merchandise. The defendant, in violation of a public duty which the law imposes upon it, as a common carrier, has refused to accept merchandise from it and deliver it to the plaintiff's customers; and, after accepting merchandise consigned to it, and which it has in its custody, has refused to deliver it to the plaintiff. The petition was demurred to, amongst other reasons, upon the grounds that it was too vague and indefinite to be made the basis of a writ of mandamus, and generally upon the ground that it failed to set forth any refusal on the defendant's part to accept or deliver any particular shipment of merchandise consigned to the plaintiff. These two grounds of demurrer were sustained and the petition was dismissed. Held:
1. 'A private person may by mandamus enforce the performance by a corporation of a public duty as to matters in which he has a special interest.' Code, § 64-103; Savannah & Ogeechee Canal Co. v. Shuman, 91 Ga. 400, 17 S.E. 937. 'A corporation engaged in business as a common carrier is bound to receive all goods offered it for transportation, which it is able and accustomed to carry, upon compliance with such reasonable regulations as it may adopt for its own safety and the benefit of the public; and a private party may, by mandamus, enforce the performance of this public duty by such common carrier as to matters in which such party has a special interest.' Southern Express Co. v. Rose Co., 124 Ga. 581, 53 S.E. 185, 5 L.R.A.,N.S., 619. See Southern Ry. Co. v. Atlanta Stove Works, 128 Ga. 207, 57 S.E. 429.
2. A demurrer, being a critic, must itself be free from imperfection, and where, as in this case, a petition is demurred to as a whole upon the ground that it 'is too vague and indefinite to be made the basis of a writ of mandamus,' such demurrer will not be considered as making an attack...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Ford Motor Co. v. Williams, 39915
...be considered as a whole, for the demurrer 'goes to the whole pleading to which it is addressed.' Beck & Gregg Hardware Co. v. Associated Transport, Inc., 210 Ga. 545(3), 81 S.E.2d 515. We are aware of the strict construction rule, the intonation of which has so often sounded the death knel......
-
Chamberlaine & Flowers, Inc. v. Smith Contracting, Inc.
...to a tort. For example, those who serve a common calling often have a duty to contract. See, e.g., Beck & Gregg Hardware Co. v. Assoc. Transport, 210 Ga. 545, 81 S.E.2d 515 (1954) (common carriers); Jackson v. Va. Hot Springs Co., 213 F. 969 (4th Cir.1914) (innkeepers); Oklahoma Natural Gas......
-
Bethel Farm Bureau v. Anderson
...a cause of action for any of the substantial relief it seeks is not subject to general demurrer. Beck & Gregg Hardware Co. v. Associated Transport, Inc., 210 Ga. 545(3) 81 S.E.2d 515. 3. Code § 105-1403, which is a codification of the common law (Ault v. Meager, 112 Ga. 148, 37 S.E. 185), d......
-
Cockfield v. Jeffcoat
...in our statutes and interpreted by our Supreme Court. Adopting the language of the court in Beck and Gregg Hardware Co. v. Associated Transport, Inc., 210 Ga. 545, 81 S.E.2d 515 (1954), we note: "A demurrer, being a critic, must itself be free from We recognize that the demurrant may have b......