Beck v. Kelly, 74--1008
| Decision Date | 25 November 1975 |
| Docket Number | No. 74--1008,74--1008 |
| Citation | 323 So.2d 667 |
| Parties | William Russell BECK, Appellant, v. John Joseph KELLY et al., Appellees. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Horton, Perse & Ginsberg, Hawkesworth & Schmick, Miami, for appellant.
Carey, Dwyer, Austin, Cole & Selwood, Steven Berger, Miami, and Joseph Grohman, Coral Gables, for appellees.
Before BARKDULL, C.J., and PEARSON and HAVERFIELD, JJ.
Plaintiff appeals a judgment entered in accordance with defendant insurer's motion for directed verdict in an action brought against the insurer for its alleged bad faith in failing to settle plaintiff's claim within the policy limits.
While standing at a bus stop, appellant, William Beck, was struck and seriously injured by an automobile operated by John Kelly. Appellee State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company had issued a liability policy on Kelly's automobile. State Farm entered into negotiations with plaintiff's attorney over the possibility of settling the case for $10,000, the limit of the policy. The settlement negotiations were unsuccessful as plaintiff's attorney never indicated an acceptance or refusal of State Farm's offer to settle. The cause proceeded to trial, at the conclusion of which the jury returned a verdict for $50,000 in compensatory damages and $5,000 in punitive damages in favor of Beck and against Kelly. The judgment was partially satisfied by payment of the policy limit of $10,000 by State Farm. Beck then filed suit against State Farm to recover the $45,000 excess over the policy limits on the alleged grounds of bad faith or misconduct on the part of State Farm in failing to settle his claim for the policy limit. This cause was tried and the jury returned a verdict for $45,000 for Beck. The trial judge, having reserved ruling on State Farm's motion for directed verdict, entered judgment for State Farm in accordance therewith. This appeal follows. We affirm.
It has long been established that an insurer is liable for the excess over policy limits of a judgment against its insured if it fails in its duty to exercise good faith in the defense, handling or settlement of the claim upon which the judgment is based. Auto Mut. Indemnity Co. v. Shaw, 134 Fla. 815, 184 So. 852 (1938). In cases where recovery of such excess is based upon the ground that the insurer's conduct in failing to effect a settlement within the policy limits amounts to bad faith, there can be no...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
General Acc. Fire & Life Assur. Corp., Ltd. v. American Cas. Co. of Reading, Pa.
...In that situation, the insured would not incur liability beyond the policy protection. When the issue presented itself in Beck v. Kelly, 323 So.2d 667 (Fla.3d DCA 1975), the court concluded that American Fidelity Fire Insurance Co. v. Johnson, supra, and Seward v. State Farm Mutual Automobi......
-
Markel Am. Ins. Co. v. Flugga
...in delaying its offer of settlement. See Chastain v. Federal Ins. Co., 338 So. 2d 214 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976) and Beck v. Kelly, 323 So.2d 667 (Fla. App. 3d Dist. 1975), both receded from in General Acc. Fire & Life Assur. Corp., Ltd. v. American Cas. Co. of Reading, Pa. 390 So. 2d 761 (......
-
Steelmet, Inc. v. Caribe Towing Corp.
...interest in excess of the dollar policy limits unless the policy contains language which provides for interest."); Beck v. Kelly, 323 So.2d 667, 668 (Fla.App.1975) (insurer liable for judgment in excess of policy limit only where it exhibits bad faith in handling the defense or claim). It i......
-
Davis v. Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co., KK-207
...S.Ct. 64, 27 L.Ed.2d 64; Chastain v. Federal Insurance Co., 338 So.2d 214 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976), Cert. den., 352 So.2d 169; Beck v. Kelly, 323 So.2d 667 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); American Fidelity Fire Insurance Co. v. Johnson, 177 So.2d 679 (Fla. 1st DCA 1965). However, we believe the facts of this......