Beheler v. National Grange Mut. Ins. Co., 18910

Decision Date30 April 1969
Docket NumberNo. 18910,18910
Citation252 S.C. 530,167 S.E.2d 436
CourtSouth Carolina Supreme Court
PartiesAnna Ruth BEHELER, Respondent, v. NATIONAL GRANGE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant. Venetia Ann BEHELER, a minor over the age of fourteen, by her Guardian and Litem, Lenell J. Beheler, Respondent, v. NATIONAL GRANGE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant.

Louis P. Howell, of Ward, Howell & Barnes, Spartanburg, for appellant.

Paul M. Moore, Spartanburg, Donald L. Ferguson, Greenville, for respondents.

MOSS, Chief Justice.

These two actions, one by Anna Ruth Beheler, and the other by Venetia Ann Beheler, by her Guardian ad litem, the respondents herein, were instituted against National Grange Mutual Insurance Company, the appellant herein, to enforce payment of certain judgments previously secured by them against one Joseph Eugene Brown, in personal injury actions.

It appears that on February 27, 1965, that Joseph Eugene Brown, while operating a 1956 Mercury automobile, the title thereto being registered with the South Carolina Highway Department in the name of Robert Floyd Brown, ran into the rear of an automobile in which the respondents were riding as passengers, causing bodily injury to said respondents. Thereafter, the respondents filed suit against Joseph Eugene Brown for the bodily injuries sustained and such resulted in a verdict and judgment in favor of Anna Ruth Beheler in the sum of $15,000.00, and a verdict and judgment in favor of Venetia Ann Beheler in the sum of $10,000.00.

At the time of the collision which resulted in injuries to the respondents, there was in force and effect an automobile liability insurance policy issued by the appellant to Shirley B. Flint, sister of Joseph Eugene Brown, and covering her 1956 Chevrolet automobile. In the said policy the appellant agreed to pay on behalf of the insured all sums which the insured shall become legally obligated to pay as damages because of bodily injury arising out of the ownership, maintenance or use of the owned automobile or any non-owned automobile. The persons insured under said policy with respect to an owned automobile were the named insured and any resident of the same household, and with respect to a non-owned automobile, the named insured and any relative but only with respect to a private passenger automobile, provided that the actual operation of the non-owned automobile was with the permission of the owner. The policy defines a 'non-owned automobile' as one not owned by or furnished for the regular use of either the named insured or any relative.

It is admitted that at the time of the injuries to the respondents that Joseph Eugene Brown resided in the same household with his sister, Shirley B. Flint, at 161 Seay Street, in the City of Spartanburg. It follows that Joseph Eugene Brown was an insured under the policy issued by the appellant to Shirley B. Flint.

It is the contention of the appellant that there was an agreement between Robert Floyd Brown and Joseph Eugene Brown concerning the ownership of the 1956 Mercury automobile and such created a partial equitable ownership of such automobile in Joseph Eugene Brown and, therefore, such Mercury automobile was not a 'non-owned' automobile as defined in the liability policy of the insured, and as a result such did not provide coverage to Joseph Eugene Brown while operating such automobile. The appellant further contends that the 1956 Mercury automobile was furnished for the regular use of Joseph Eugene Brown and for this reason such was not a 'non-owned' automobile as defined in appellant's liability insurance policy.

This case came on for trial before The Honorable Wade S. Weatherford, Presiding Judge, and a jury. After all the testimony had been taken, by agreement of the attorneys for the parties, the case was withdrawn from the jury and submitted to the court for determination of all issues in the case. The court, by order dated August 10, 1968, resolved all issues in favor of the respondents. This appeal followed.

Robert Floyd Brown, who resided on Edgewood Avenue which was across town from Seay Street where Joseph Eugene Brown resided, purchased the 1956 Mercury automobile from Pierce Motor Company of Spartanburg, South Carolina, in June, 1964 and the title to said automobile was registered in his name. He admitted on direct examination that on February 27, 1965, he owned the automobile in question. At the time of...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Mathis v. Brown & Brown Of South Carolina Inc
    • United States
    • South Carolina Supreme Court
    • 9 Agosto 2010
    ...a jury verdict upon the issues and are conclusive on appeal when supported by competent evidence. See Beheler v. Nat'l Grange Mut. Ins. Co., 252 S.C. 530, 535, 167 S.E.2d 436, 438 (1969). Accordingly, this Court's scope of review is limited to determining whether the findings are supported ......
  • Keeler v. Allstate Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • South Carolina Supreme Court
    • 27 Agosto 1973
    ...judge has reached a conclusion of which the facts are susceptible. We are bound by his findings of fact. Beheler v. National Grange Mutual Ins. Co., 252 S.C. 530, 167 S.E.2d 436. The trial judge having concluded that the use of the insured automobile by Troy D. Taylor, at the time of the co......
  • Townsend v. Singleton
    • United States
    • South Carolina Supreme Court
    • 1 Septiembre 1971
    ...of a jury verdict upon the issues, and are conclusive upon appeal when supported by competent evidence. Beheler v. National Grange Mut. Ins. Co., 252 S.C. 530, 167 S.E.2d 436. We consider the exceptions in the light of this It appears from the testimony that the respondents own a tract of l......
  • Carolina Mechanical Contractors, Inc. v. Yeargin Const. Co., Inc., 19652
    • United States
    • South Carolina Supreme Court
    • 9 Julio 1973
    ...force and effect of a jury verdict, and are conclusive upon appeal when supported by competent evidence. Beheler v. National Grange Mut. Ins. Co., 252 S.C. 530, 167 S.E.2d 436 (1969); Reid v. Hardware Mut. Ins. Co. of Carolinas, Inc., 252 S.C. 339, 166 S.E.2d 317 (1969). And this Court will......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT