Belanger v. Rice, 8125
Decision Date | 02 July 1954 |
Docket Number | No. 8125,8125 |
Citation | 2 Utah 2d 250,272 P.2d 173 |
Parties | d 250 BELANGER et al. v. RICE. |
Court | Utah Supreme Court |
Benjamin Spence, Salt Lake City, for appellants.
O. H. Matthews, Salt Lake City, for respondent.
Defendant, under a written lease, subleased a small ten-stool restaurant and coffee shop from plaintiffs for a period from March 17, 1952, to March 17, 1953, with rent of $75 payable monthly. Plaintiffs held the premises under a written lease from William Yeiter, who also owned a residence to the rear of the restaurant. Yeiter, during the time that he occupied the residence, furnished hot water to the restaurant from facilities in the house. On May 27, 1952, Rice rented the house from Yeiter and moved into it. The following November, Rice informed plaintiffs that because of his wife's ill health he would be unable to continue the operation of the restaurant and on December 1, 1952, he delivered the keys to Plaintiff Jocelyn, paying $37.50 for the rental value of the place from November 17th to November 30th. Plaintiffs advertised and obtained a tenant on December 8th, but this tenant remained only until December 28th because there was no hot water in the refreshment bar when Rice, then living in the house, refused to furnish it.
Plaintiffs instituted suit on December 13th in the Small Claims Court for rent for the period of December 1st to December 8th, and defendant settled with plaintiffs on December 19th for the amount of $15 rent and $5.50 as the cost of advertising to secure a new tenant.
After the premises were vacated by Jones, the tenant who remained in possession from December 8th to December 28th, plaintiffs brought suit to recover on their lease with defendant and recovered a judgment in the City Court for $202.50, as rent due from December 28th to the date of expiration of the lease, March 17, 1953. On appeal to the District Court, a judgment of no cause of action was entered, the court finding that the lease was surrendered, rather than abandoned, by the defendant.
The question raised on appeal here is whether facts surrounding the final transactions between the plaintiffs and defendant will sustain the trial court's finding of surrender, which would cut off rights of both parties under the lease.
A surrender may take place where there is an express agreement of the parties or by operation of law. There is no evidence of an express agreement, and hence we must examine those elements which might give rise to a surrender by operation of law. As stated in 32 Am.Jur., Landlord and Tenant, Sec. 905:
In the case of Willis v. Kronendonk, 58 Utah 592, 200 P. 1025, 18 A.L.R. 947, an acceptance of possession after relinquishment by the tenant following a conversation in which the tenant stated that he could not 'make it' if the rent were not reduced, which the landlord refused to do, and a reletting of the premises were held to be sufficient to establish surrender and acceptance. However, all the facts must be considered inasmuch as the acceptance of the keys might well be merely in order to protect the property and the reletting of the premises might equally logically be for the purpose of mitigating damages in a suit upon the lease.
In the present case, plaintiff Belanger testified:
If, indeed, this was not an unconditional acceptance of the surrender on November 17th, the condition of acceptance was fulfilled after plaintiffs obtained a new tenant and received payment of the advertising costs from defendant. Further, in accepting payment for the period of time from December 1st to December 8th and the advertising fee, Mrs. Belanger, whose status as an agent for plaintiffs has not been attacked, gave a receipt on which she wrote 'in full.' These facts, taken as a whole, are such as to support the lower court's finding that the plaintiffs accepted surrender of the lease.
It is fundamental that where a tenant surrenders and the landlord accepts the premises during the term of the lease, the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Reid v. Mutual of Omaha Ins. Co.
...Joes, 558 P.2d at 1330; Mariani Air Prods. Co. v. Gill's Tire Mkt., 29 Utah 2d 291, 293, 508 P.2d 808, 810 (1973); Belanger v. Rice, 2 Utah 2d 250, 272 P.2d 173 (1954); 2 R. Powell, The Law of Real Property p 249 (1988). The lease agreement between the Reids and Mutual deals specifically wi......
- Yeargin v. AUDITING DIV. OF STATE TAX
-
John C. Cutler Ass'n v. De Jay Stores
...was not laid in this case and the evidence was properly excluded. 1 Willis v. Kronendonk, 58 Utah 592, 200 P. 1025.2 Belanger v. Rice, 2 Utah 2d 250, 272 P.2d 173.3 Clawson v. Boston Acme Mines Development Co., 72 Utah 137, 269 P. 147.1 58 Utah 592, 200 P. 1025, 1030, 18 A.L.R. 947.2 2 Utah......
-
In re Mountain States Sports, Inc.
...premises are not alone sufficient to constitute a surrender and acceptance was recited by this court in the recent case of Belanger v. Rice 2 Utah 2d 250, 272 P.2d 173: `* * * Acceptance of the keys might well be merely in order to protect the property and the reletting of the premises migh......