Bell v. Atlanta Cooperage Co., 45097
| Decision Date | 17 February 1970 |
| Docket Number | No. 45097,No. 2,45097,2 |
| Citation | 121 Ga.App. 207,173 S.E.2d 427 |
| Parties | R. C. BELL v. ATLANTA COOPERAGE COMPANY, Inc. et al |
| Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
Stanley H. Nylen, Atlanta, for appellant.
Dunaway, Shelfer, Haas & Newberry, William S. Shelfer, Jr., Atlanta, for appellees.
Syllabus Opinion by the Court
Under the Civil Practice Act (), a complaint should not be dismissed unless the averments in the complaint disclose with certainty that the plaintiff would not be entitled to relief under any state of facts which could be proved in support of such claim. Harper v. DeFreitas, 117 Ga.App. 236, 238, 160 S.E.2d 260. The petition in the present case being amply sufficient to meet the requirements of the Act, and not affirmatively disclosing that complainant is not entitled to relief under facts provable under the allegations made, the trial court erred in sustaining the motion to dismiss.
Judgment reversed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Lawrimore v. Sun Finance Co., 48517
...means unpaid balance on the principal. Lanier v. Consolidated Loan & Finance Co., 47 Ga.App. 148(3), 170 S.E. 99; Bell v. Atlanta Cooperage Co., 121 Ga.App. 207, 173 S.E.2d 427. The judgment was entered for 'Principal $850.06, and attorney fee $127.50.' It does not provide for interest afte......
-
McGee v. State, 45048
... ... Richard Bell, Dist. Atty., Dennis F. Jones, Decatur, for appellee ... ...
-
Farmers Feed & Fertilizer Co., Inc. v. Lynn, 47737
...would not be entitled to relief under any state of facts which could be proved in support of such claim.' Bell v. Atlanta Cooperage Co., Inc., 121 Ga.App. 207, 173 S.E.2d 427. See Tri-City Sanitation, Inc. v. Action Sanitation Service, Inc., 227 Ga. 489, 181 S.E.2d 377; Gill v. Myrick, 228 ......