Bell v. Builders Transport

Decision Date08 February 1996
Docket NumberNo. 490P95,490P95
Citation467 S.E.2d 704,342 N.C. 651
PartiesLeslie BELL, Employee, Plaintiff, v. BUILDERS TRANSPORT, Employer; Self-Insured, Defendants.
CourtNorth Carolina Supreme Court

Robert M. Talford, Charlotte, for Leslie Bell.

Dayle A. Flammia, Raleigh, for Builders Transport et al.

Prior report: 120 N.C.App. 642, 463 S.E.2d 82.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th day of February 1996."

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Price v. Howard
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • 18 de junho de 1996
    ...480, 482, 462 S.E.2d 835, 836 (1995); Bivens v. Cottle, 120 N.C.App. 467, 468, 462 S.E.2d 829, 830 (1995), disc. review allowed, 342 N.C. 651, 467 S.E.2d 704, appeal retained and disc. review allowed, --- N.C. ----, 467 S.E.2d 898 (1996); Speaks v. Fanek, 122 N.C.App. 389, 390, 470 S.E.2d 8......
  • Speaks v. Fanek, COA95-247
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • 7 de maio de 1996
    ...S.E.2d 835, 836 (1995); and see Bivens v. Cottle, 120 N.C.App. 467, 468-69, 462 S.E.2d 829, 830 (1995), disc. review allowed, 342 N.C. 651, 467 S.E.2d 704 (1996). Unquestionably, this case does not involve an initial custody matter. The trial court's order of 23 March 1992 decrees: "The pla......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT