Bell v. General Motors Assembly Div.

Decision Date01 December 1987
Docket NumberNo. 52524,52524
PartiesVernon BELL, Claimant/Appellant, v. GENERAL MOTORS ASSEMBLY DIVISION, Respondent.
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

Harry James Nichols, St. Louis, for claimant/appellant.

Daniel J. Harlan, St. Louis, for respondent.

GARY M. GAERTNER, Presiding Judge.

The employee (Bell) appeals from a decision by the Missouri Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) in favor of Bell and against employer (General Motors Assembly Division). The Commission, none dissenting, awarded Bell twenty percent permanent partial disability, thus modifying the award of the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) who had determined that Bell sustained seventy-five percent permanent partial disability. The Circuit Court of the City of Saint Louis affirmed the Commission's award. The sole issue on appeal is whether the decision of the circuit court affirming the Commission's award is supported by competent and substantial evidence. We affirm the judgment of the circuit court.

The evidence reveals that in March 1974 Bell was employed by General Motors Assembly Division and that on about March 30, 1974, Bell sustained an injury in the course of his employment. Bell was pushing a vehicle when he experienced pain in his back.

At the hearing before the ALJ in 1983, voluminous medical evidence and testimony was presented; Bell consulted numerous physicians and was hospitalized on several occasions. Briefly summarized, the following was offered into evidence: Dr. Murphy, a treating physician relied upon by Bell, stated Bell had sustained twenty percent permanent partial disability attributable to the March 1974 accident. Records from Saint Elizabeth's Hospital showed Dr. Lehr, also a treating physician, had written, "[N]o injury noted; chronic lumbar sprain, possible herniated disc, however, clinically, I cannot find this." Saint Elizabeth's records indicated as well that Dr. Meirink, after a consultation with Bell, had diagnosed chronic lumbar sprain and ruled out herniated nucleous pulposus. Additionally, the hospital records showed a completely normal myelogram. General Motors Assembly Division introduced the deposition of Dr. Rosenbaum, who had examined Bell in November 1979 and January 1983. Dr. Rosenbaum found no evidence of a herniated disc. He concluded by stating there appeared to be no medical reason why Bell could not engage in his occupation if he so desired, and that Bell suffered from absolutely no disability.

The ALJ determined that Bell sustained permanent partial disability of seventy-five percent. The Commission then modified the ALJ's award by reducing the amount to twenty percent permanent partial disability. On appeal, the function...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Medvik v. Ollendorff, 54792
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • 18 de abril de 1989
    ...proceedings. § 536.080.2 RSMo 1986; see e.g. Ferrario v. Bear, 745 S.W.2d 193, 197-198 (Mo.App.1987); Bell v. Gen'l Motors Assembly Div., 742 S.W.2d 225, 226 (Mo.App.1987). Medvik's real complaint is that Ollendorff classified Medvik's violations. Those violations were uncontested and, thus......
  • Jones v. Jefferson City School Dist., s. WD
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • 26 de dezembro de 1990
    ...does not in any way bind the Commission; the Commission is free to disregard the ALJ's finding of fact." Bell v. General Motors Assembly Div., 742 S.W.2d 225, 226 (Mo.App.1987). After the Commission has reached its determination, this court reviews the Commission's award and not the finding......
  • Hatter v. Cleaning Service Co.
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • 3 de setembro de 1991
    ...does not in any way bind the Commission; the Commission is free to disregard the ALJ's findings of fact." Bell v. General Motors Assembly Div., 742 S.W.2d 225, 226 (Mo.App.1987). Additionally, the Commission has discretion to accept or reject the credibility of witnesses; "[t]he Commission ......
  • Riggs v. Daniel Intern.
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • 16 de maio de 1989
    ...supported by competent and substantial evidence and not contrary to the overwhelming weight of the evidence. Bell v. General Motors Assembly Div., 742 S.W.2d 225, 226 (Mo.App.1987). In its brief, the employer contends there was no evidence to establish Riggs was disabled between September 1......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT