Bell v. Lang

Decision Date17 May 1901
Docket Number12,543 - (93)
PartiesHENRY BELL v. ROBERT A. LANG
CourtMinnesota Supreme Court

Action in the district court for St. Louis county to recover $15,000 damages for personal injuries. The case was tried before Jaggard, J., who at the close of plaintiff's testimony directed a verdict for defendant. From an order denying a motion for a new trial, plaintiff appealed. Affirmed.

SYLLABUS

Personal Injury -- Fellow Servant.

The plaintiff and S., the servants of the defendant, were assigned the duty of loading a pile-driver hammer upon a wagon. In doing so they used a tree standing by as a tackle post, which was uprooted, fell, and injured the plaintiff, by reason of the force applied in an attempt to swing the hammer upon the wagon by the use of the tackle. S. selected the tree and directed the work as foreman. Held, upon the special facts of this case, that the tree was not an appliance furnished by the defendant, but a mere temporary instrumentality provided by the servants themselves during the progress of the work, and that in selecting the tree S was not acting as a vice principal.

C. D. & Thos. D. O'Brien, for appellant.

Chas H. Taylor and Frawley, Bundy & Wilcox, for respondent.

OPINION

START, C.J.

This is an action to recover damages for a personal injury sustained by the plaintiff while in the employ of the defendant on the alleged ground that the defendant was negligent in furnishing unsafe appliances for the work in which the plaintiff was engaged, and in failing to inspect them, and in failing to instruct him as to the danger of the place in which he was required to work. At the close of the plaintiff's evidence the trial court directed a verdict for the defendant, and the plaintiff appealed from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

The evidence tended to establish these facts: The defendant, in October, 1896, was engaged in building a dam across the Nemadji river, in Wisconsin, upon which he employed a crew of some forty men, of whom the plaintiff was one; also Charles Sherman, who was the engineer on the pile driver, and directed the men when and where to work in the absence of the defendant. The plaintiff was principally employed in driving oxen and getting out timber in the woods for the dam. He was forty-two years old, and had worked for twenty-six years in logging in the woods, driving logs in the river, and as an explorer looking up and estimating timber in the woods, and was entirely familiar with the different kinds of trees when he saw them. After the work on the dam had been completed and on the evening before the plaintiff was injured, Mr. Sherman, who is hereafter designated, for convenience, as the "foreman," directed him to haul the hammer of the pile driver to the top of the hill, and leave it at the foot of a tree there standing. He did so, and on the next morning the foreman and the plaintiff went with block and tackle for the purpose of loading the hammer, which weighed some fourteen hundred pounds, upon a wagon, for the purpose of hauling it to another place. The plaintiff, at the direction or suggestion of the foreman, climbed the tree some fourteen feet, and attached a block to it by means of a chain, and a second block was fastened to the tree at its foot. A rope was passed through the blocks, one end of it fastened to the hammer, and the oxen hitched to the other. The hammer was then, by starting the oxen, raised and placed upon a plank resting on the top of two barrels. Then another rope was fastened to the hammer, and thrown crosswise of the wagon, and the oxen hitched to this rope, for the purpose of swinging the hammer out over and placing it upon the wagon. When the oxen were started, the hammer was pulled a way from the tree, the weight of the hammer and the force exerted by the oxen pulled the tree up by the roots without breaking it, and in falling it struck the plaintiff upon the neck, shoulder, and arm, breaking the latter, and otherwise injuring him. The tree selected as a post for the tackle was a black birch, some forty feet high, twelve inches in diameter at the butt, and eight inches at the point where the chain was placed around it. Its top had been broken off, and the tree was dead, and any woodsman...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT