Bell v. Louisville Bd. of Fire Underwriters

Decision Date16 February 1912
Citation146 Ky. 841,143 S.W. 388
PartiesBELL, Ins. Com'r, v. LOUISVILLE BOARD OF FIRE UNDERWRITERS. [d]
CourtKentucky Court of Appeals

Appeal from Circuit Court, Jefferson County; Chancery Branch, Second Division.

Action by Charles W. Bell, Insurance Commissioner of Kentucky against the Louisville Board of Fire Underwriters. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals. Reversed and remanded for judgment, as directed.

Carroll & Middleton and T. B. McGregor, for appellant.

Helm Bruce and Bruce & Bullitt, for appellee.

SETTLE J.

It appears from the record before us that this is an agreed case between Chas. W. Bell, Insurance Commissioner of Kentucky and the Louisville Board of Fire Underwriters, presenting for adjudication, as allowed by section 637, Civil Code, the question whether the Insurance Commissioner has a right, in his official capacity, to examine the records, books, and papers of the Louisville Board of Fire Underwriters. The circuit court decided that the Insurance Commissioner did not have such right; hence this appeal.

In order that every aspect of the controversy may be understood we here insert the agreement between the parties, which includes the facts out of which it arose and the questions submitted:

"Charles W. Bell, Insurance Commissioner of the state of Kentucky, hereinafter called 'plaintiff,' and the Louisville Board of Fire Underwriters, hereinafter called the 'defendant,' state that there is a controversy between them which might be made the subject of a civil action; that the controversy is real, and that this proceeding is in good faith to determine the rights of the parties. The facts are as follows:
"Plaintiff is the duly appointed, qualified, and acting Insurance Commissioner of the state of Kentucky, and charged with all the duties and invested with all the powers, responsibilities, and obligations conferred upon that officer by the laws of the commonwealth. Defendant is a voluntary, unincorporated association, the organization and purposes of which are shown by the Constitution, bylaws, and rules of the organization. A copy of said constitution, by-laws, and rules is filed herewith and made part of the statement of facts in this case, the same as if fully set out herein, marked 'Exhibit A.' The members of the defendant organization have access to the surveys, books, records, and papers of the defendant, and in the transaction of their business as insurance agents have the right to use, and do use, such of the surveys, books, records, and papers as are of use or value to them in the transaction of their business.
"Defendant fixes the rates of fire and tornado insurance which it considers proper to be charged upon property in the city of Louisville, and exercises all the other powers and performs all the other duties mentioned in its constitution, by-laws, and rules, and in doing so uses its survey, books, records, and papers, so far as relevant to such subject. No insurance company is bound or is required to agree to charge the rates thus fixed, or comply with the other conditions imposed; but if any insurance company fails to charge such rates, or comply with the other conditions imposed, and does charge rates inconsistent therewith, or act contrary to the other conditions imposed, then any member of the defendant who is an agent of such company is required, either to surrender such company, or cease to be a member of defendant.

"Plaintiff has heretofore demanded of defendant the right to inspect its surveys, books, records, and papers which are used as aforesaid; and he has also demanded of certain individual agents licensed by the state, who are members of defendant, that they permit him to inspect and examine such of the surveys, books, records, and papers of defendant as are used by them, as hereinbefore described. Said demands were refused.

"Plaintiff does not desire to make said examination because he believes, or has reason to believe, that any insurance company, whose agent is a member of defendant, is in an unsound condition; but he desires to make said examination because complaint has been made to him that the premium rates charged for insurance by companies, whose agents are members of defendant, are excessive, and he deems it prudent, therefore, for the protection of the policy holders of this commonwealth to make said examination. He has issued and published an opinion, stating his views and purposes with reference to the proposed investigation, which is filed herewith as part hereof, marked 'Exhibit B.'

"The defendant has been an organization, doing business under its present name, and with the same general purposes and of the same general character, continuously since the year 1854 (except for a brief period during the Civil War), and within this period of time no license has ever been issued to it as an insurance agent, nor has any insurance commissioner or public officer of Kentucky, so far as known to plaintiff or defendant, or any of its officers ever asserted or demantled the right to make an examination of the records, books, or papers of defendant, until the present demand was made."

Upon the foregoing statement of facts, the questions to be determined are as follows: (1) Has plaintiff the right to examine the surveys, books, records, and papers of the defendant? (2) Has the plaintiff the right to require individual agents, who are members of the defendant, to produce for his inspection and examination any of the surveys, books, records, or papers of the defendant?

It is conceded by the parties that whatever right or power of examination rests in the Commissioner is derived from section 752, Kentucky Statutes, which, together with section 753, whose provisions throw light upon its meaning, we also insert in the opinion.

Section 752: "Before granting certificates of authority to an insurance company to issue policies or make contracts of insurance, he shall be satisfied, by such examination and evidence as he sees fit to make and require, that such company is otherwise duly qualified under the laws of the commonwealth to transact business therein. As often as once in four years he shall personally or by his deputy or chief clerk, or by some competent person appointed by him for the purpose, visit each domestic insurance company and thoroughly inspect and examine its affairs, especially as to financial conditions and ability to fulfill its obligations, and whether it has complied with the laws. He shall also make an examination of any such company whenever he deems it prudent to do so, or upon the request of five or more of the stockholders, creditors, policy holders or persons pecuniarily interested therein, who shall make affidavit of their belief, with specifications of their reasons thereof, that such company is in an unsound condition. Whenever he deems it prudent for the protection of policy holders in this commonwealth, he shall, in like manner, visit and examine, or cause to be visited and examined, by some competent person he may appoint for that purpose, any foreign insurance company applying for admission, or already admitted, to do business by agencies in this commonwealth. For the purposes aforesaid, the Commissioner or his deputy, or person making the examination, shall have free access to all the books and papers of an insurance company that relate to its business, and to the books and papers kept by any of its agents, and may summon and qualify a witness, under oath, and examine the directors, officers, agents and trustees of any such company, and other persons, in relation to its affairs, transactions and conditions; and such companies shall pay the proper charges incurred in such examination, including the expenses of the Commissioner or his deputy, and the expenses and compensation of his assistants employed therein. Whoever, without justifiable cause, refuses to appear and testify, when so required, or obstructs the Commissioner in the discharge of his duty, shall, for each offense, be punished by a fine not exceeding $1,000.00, or by imprisonment not exceeding one year; and if the directors, officers or agents of any foreign insurance company shall refuse to appear and testify when so required, the Insurance Commissioner shall revoke the certificate of authority and license of such company and its agents."

Section 753: "If he is of the opinion, upon an examination or other evidence, that a foreign insurance company is in an unsound condition, or if it has failed to comply with the law, or if its officers or agents refuse to submit to examination or to perform any legal obligation in relation thereto, or, if a life insurance company, that its actual funds are less than its liabilities, he shall revoke or suspend all certificates of authority granted to it or its agents, and shall cause...

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Citizens' Ins. Co. v. Clay
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Kentucky
    • 10 Junio 1912
    ... ... to defeat the motion: ... 1. Fire ... insurance is a commercial necessity, and its character tends ... to ... agreements, and the existence of such legislation. Bell ... v. Louisville Board of Fire Underwriters, 146 Ky. 841, ... 143 S.W ... ...
  • Continental Coal Corporation of Tennessee v. Cole's Adm'r
    • United States
    • Kentucky Court of Appeals
    • 16 Febrero 1912
    ... ...          Appeal ... from Circuit Court, Bell County ...          Action ... by W. P. Cole's administrator ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT