Bello v. Cablevision Systems Corp.

CourtNew York Court of Appeals
Citation592 N.Y.S.2d 670,80 N.Y.2d 761
Parties, 607 N.E.2d 817 Bello (Carl) v. Cablevision Systems Corporation NO. 981
Decision Date19 November 1992

Page 670

592 N.Y.S.2d 670
80 N.Y.2d 761, 607 N.E.2d 817
Bello (Carl)
v.
Cablevision Systems Corporation
NO. 981
Court of Appeals of New York
Nov 19, 1992

185 A.D.2d 262, 587 N.Y.S.2d 1; 185 A.D.2d 262, 587 N.Y.S.2d 209

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL

GRANTED OR DENIED.

Denied.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 practice notes
  • Glitman v. State, 2021-51283
    • United States
    • New York Court of Claims
    • November 23, 2021
    ...submitted in conjunction with the CPLR 3211 motion" (Bello v Cablevision Sys. Corp., 185 A.D.2d 262, 263 [2d Dept 1992], lv denied 80 N.Y.2d 761 [1992]; see CPLR 3211[c] [allowing either party to submit admissible evidence]; Chrysler Capital Corp. v Hilltop Egg Farms, Inc., 129 A.D.2d 927, ......
  • Glitman v. State, Claim 133807
    • United States
    • New York Court of Claims
    • November 23, 2021
    ...submitted in conjunction with the CPLR 3211 motion" (Bello v Cablevision Sys. Corp., 185 A.D.2d 262, 263 [2d Dept 1992], lv denied 80 N.Y.2d 761 [1992]; see CPLR 3211[c] [allowing either party to submit admissible evidence]; Chrysler Capital Corp. v Hilltop Egg Farms, Inc., 129 A.D.2d 927, ......
  • Hertz Corp. v. Avis, Inc., No. 94 Civ. 7384 (JFK).
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. Southern District of New York
    • November 3, 1994
    ...Business Law claims. See Bello v. Cablevision Systems Corp., 185 A.D.2d 262, 587 N.Y.S.2d 1, 2 (2d Dep't), leave to appeal denied, 80 N.Y.2d 761, 607 N.E.2d 817, 592 N.Y.S.2d 670 (1992). In addition, the Court notes that plaintiff failed to present evidence of actual deception. Moreover, pl......
  • Coventry Real Estate Advisors v. Developers Diversified Realty Corp..
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • May 17, 2011
    ...Agreement and the Management Agreements) ( see Bello v. Cablevision Sys. Corp., 185 A.D.2d 262, 263, 587 N.Y.S.2d 1 [1992], lv. denied 80 N.Y.2d 761, 592 N.Y.S.2d 670, 607 N.E.2d 817 [1992] ). The court also properly denied plaintiffs' motion for leave to replead. In this regard, plaintiffs......
4 cases
  • Glitman v. State, 2021-51283
    • United States
    • New York Court of Claims
    • November 23, 2021
    ...submitted in conjunction with the CPLR 3211 motion" (Bello v Cablevision Sys. Corp., 185 A.D.2d 262, 263 [2d Dept 1992], lv denied 80 N.Y.2d 761 [1992]; see CPLR 3211[c] [allowing either party to submit admissible evidence]; Chrysler Capital Corp. v Hilltop Egg Farms, Inc., 129 A.D.2d 927, ......
  • Glitman v. State, Claim 133807
    • United States
    • New York Court of Claims
    • November 23, 2021
    ...submitted in conjunction with the CPLR 3211 motion" (Bello v Cablevision Sys. Corp., 185 A.D.2d 262, 263 [2d Dept 1992], lv denied 80 N.Y.2d 761 [1992]; see CPLR 3211[c] [allowing either party to submit admissible evidence]; Chrysler Capital Corp. v Hilltop Egg Farms, Inc., 129 A.D.2d 927, ......
  • Hertz Corp. v. Avis, Inc., No. 94 Civ. 7384 (JFK).
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. Southern District of New York
    • November 3, 1994
    ...Business Law claims. See Bello v. Cablevision Systems Corp., 185 A.D.2d 262, 587 N.Y.S.2d 1, 2 (2d Dep't), leave to appeal denied, 80 N.Y.2d 761, 607 N.E.2d 817, 592 N.Y.S.2d 670 (1992). In addition, the Court notes that plaintiff failed to present evidence of actual deception. Moreover, pl......
  • Coventry Real Estate Advisors v. Developers Diversified Realty Corp..
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • May 17, 2011
    ...Agreement and the Management Agreements) ( see Bello v. Cablevision Sys. Corp., 185 A.D.2d 262, 263, 587 N.Y.S.2d 1 [1992], lv. denied 80 N.Y.2d 761, 592 N.Y.S.2d 670, 607 N.E.2d 817 [1992] ). The court also properly denied plaintiffs' motion for leave to replead. In this regard, plaintiffs......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT