Bellsouth Telecommunications, Inc. v. City of Laurinburg

Decision Date06 April 2005
Docket NumberNo. 118P05.,118P05.
Citation615 S.E.2d 660
CourtNorth Carolina Supreme Court
PartiesBELLSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. v. CITY OF LAURINBURG, a North Carolina Municipal Corporation, and School Link, Inc., a North Carolina Corporation.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 606 S.E.2d 721.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 22nd day of February 2005 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of April 2005."

Justice MARTIN recused.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • King v. Town of Chapel Hill
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • June 4, 2013
    ...Laurinburg, 168 N.C.App. 75, 80, 606 S.E.2d 721, 724 (citations and quotation marks omitted), disc. review denied,––– N.C. ––––, 615 S.E.2d 660 (2005) [hereinafter BellSouth ]. Therefore, “[a] city or town in this State has no inherent police power. It may exercise only such powers as are e......
  • Morgan v. Lexington Furniture Industries, Inc., No. COA06-1 (N.C. App. 12/19/2006)
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • December 19, 2006
    ...fact." BellSouth Telecomm., Inc. v. City of Laurinburg, 168 N.C. App. 75, 80, 606 S.E.2d 721, 724 (2005), disc. review denied, __ N.C. __, 615 S.E.2d 660-61 (2005). Similarly, "[t]he trial court's conclusion that a particular dispute is or is not subject to arbitration is a conclusion of la......
  • Smith v. Harris
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • February 6, 2007
    ...material fact." BellSouth Telecomms., Inc. v. City of Laurinburg, 168 N.C.App. 75, 80, 606 S.E.2d 721, 724, disc. rev. denied, 359 N.C. 629, 615 S.E.2d 660 (2005). Plaintiff's personal automobile insurance policy included underinsured motorists coverage. Under this portion of the policy, de......
  • Five C's, Inc. v. County of Pasquotank
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • February 17, 2009
    ...citing Homebuilders Assn. of Charlotte, 336 N.C. at 43-44, 442 S.E.2d at 49-50 and Smith, 70 N.C. at 14, disc. review denied, 615 S.E.2d 660 (2005)). This Court has also stated since Homebuilders Assn. of Charlotte [N.C. Gen.Stat. §] 153A-4 does state that any legislative act affecting coun......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT