Belsky v. Lowenthal
Decision Date | 31 May 1979 |
Citation | 47 N.Y.2d 820,418 N.Y.S.2d 573,392 N.E.2d 560 |
Parties | , 392 N.E.2d 560 Marvin S. BELSKY, Appellant, v. Ilona LOWENTHAL et al., Respondents. |
Court | New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals |
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
The first and third causes of action sounding in malicious prosecution were properly dismissed inasmuch as neither contains any allegation of interference with plaintiff's person or property (Drago v. Buonagurio, 46 N.Y.2d 778, 413 N.Y.S.2d 910, 386 N.E.2d 821; Williams v. Williams, 23 N.Y.2d 592, 298 N.Y.S.2d 473, 246 N.E.2d 333). The fourth cause of action, characterized by appellant in our court as alleging a claim for prima facie or intentional tort, was likewise properly dismissed by the Appellate Division for the reasons stated in the opinion of Mr. Justice Herbert B. Evans. (Cf. Drago v. Buonagurio, supra; Fischer v. Maloney, 43 N.Y.2d 553, 557-558, 402 N.Y.S.2d 991, 992-993, 373 N.E.2d 1215, 1217.)
Order affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Tarr v. Credit Suisse Asset Management, Inc.
...motives of the disappointed plaintiff, thus affording a forum for a never ending source of new litigation"), affd, 47 N.Y.2d 820, 418 N.Y.S.2d 573, 392 N.E.2d 560 (1979). Specifically, a claim for prima facie tort "`cannot be allowed in circumvention of the unavailability of a tort claim fo......
-
Donahue v. Pendleton Woolen Mills, Inc.
...elements of a traditional tort. Belsky v. Lowenthal, 62 A.D.2d 319, 405 N.Y.S.2d 62, 64 (1st Dep't 1978), aff'd mem., 47 N.Y.2d 820, 392 N.E.2d 560, 418 N.Y.S.2d 573 (1979). Plaintiffs may plead their claims in the alternative, Board of Educ. of Farmingdale v. Farmingdale Classroom Teachers......
-
O'BRIEN v. Alexander
...(absent a unique quality) to stand. Belsky v. Lowenthal, 62 A.D.2d 319, 322, 405 N.Y.S.2d 62, 65 (1st Dep't), aff'd, 47 N.Y.2d 820, 392 N.E.2d 560, 418 N.Y.S.2d 573 (1978); accord Kalso Systemet, Inc. v. Jacobs, 474 F.Supp. at 671. Accordingly, plaintiff's claim for general tort is dismisse......
-
Chrysler Corp. v. Fedders Corp.
...case. Both sides cite Belsky v. Lowenthal, 62 App.Div.2d 319, 321, 405 N.Y.S.2d 62, 64 (1st Dep't. 1978), aff'd., 47 N.Y.2d 820, 418 N.Y.S.2d 573, 392 N.E.2d 560 (1979), where the First Department wrote in order to state a cause of action for malicious prosecution plaintiff must establish c......