Belsky v. Lowenthal

Decision Date31 May 1979
Citation47 N.Y.2d 820,418 N.Y.S.2d 573,392 N.E.2d 560
Parties, 392 N.E.2d 560 Marvin S. BELSKY, Appellant, v. Ilona LOWENTHAL et al., Respondents.
CourtNew York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
Lester J. Tanner, Anders R. Sterner and Lawrence S. Yee, New York City, for appellant.
OPINION OF THE COURT MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

The first and third causes of action sounding in malicious prosecution were properly dismissed inasmuch as neither contains any allegation of interference with plaintiff's person or property (Drago v. Buonagurio, 46 N.Y.2d 778, 413 N.Y.S.2d 910, 386 N.E.2d 821; Williams v. Williams, 23 N.Y.2d 592, 298 N.Y.S.2d 473, 246 N.E.2d 333). The fourth cause of action, characterized by appellant in our court as alleging a claim for prima facie or intentional tort, was likewise properly dismissed by the Appellate Division for the reasons stated in the opinion of Mr. Justice Herbert B. Evans. (Cf. Drago v. Buonagurio, supra; Fischer v. Maloney, 43 N.Y.2d 553, 557-558, 402 N.Y.S.2d 991, 992-993, 373 N.E.2d 1215, 1217.)

COOKE, C. J., and JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER and FUCHSBERG, JJ., concur in memorandum.

Order affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
66 cases
  • Tarr v. Credit Suisse Asset Management, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of New York
    • April 11, 1997
    ...motives of the disappointed plaintiff, thus affording a forum for a never ending source of new litigation"), affd, 47 N.Y.2d 820, 418 N.Y.S.2d 573, 392 N.E.2d 560 (1979). Specifically, a claim for prima facie tort "`cannot be allowed in circumvention of the unavailability of a tort claim fo......
  • Donahue v. Pendleton Woolen Mills, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • March 21, 1986
    ...elements of a traditional tort. Belsky v. Lowenthal, 62 A.D.2d 319, 405 N.Y.S.2d 62, 64 (1st Dep't 1978), aff'd mem., 47 N.Y.2d 820, 392 N.E.2d 560, 418 N.Y.S.2d 573 (1979). Plaintiffs may plead their claims in the alternative, Board of Educ. of Farmingdale v. Farmingdale Classroom Teachers......
  • O'BRIEN v. Alexander
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • August 29, 1995
    ...(absent a unique quality) to stand. Belsky v. Lowenthal, 62 A.D.2d 319, 322, 405 N.Y.S.2d 62, 65 (1st Dep't), aff'd, 47 N.Y.2d 820, 392 N.E.2d 560, 418 N.Y.S.2d 573 (1978); accord Kalso Systemet, Inc. v. Jacobs, 474 F.Supp. at 671. Accordingly, plaintiff's claim for general tort is dismisse......
  • Chrysler Corp. v. Fedders Corp.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • June 10, 1982
    ...case. Both sides cite Belsky v. Lowenthal, 62 App.Div.2d 319, 321, 405 N.Y.S.2d 62, 64 (1st Dep't. 1978), aff'd., 47 N.Y.2d 820, 418 N.Y.S.2d 573, 392 N.E.2d 560 (1979), where the First Department wrote in order to state a cause of action for malicious prosecution plaintiff must establish c......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT