Belvin v. U.S., 76-1245
| Decision Date | 19 August 1976 |
| Docket Number | No. 76-1245,76-1245 |
| Citation | 538 F.2d 1335 |
| Parties | Jerry A. BELVIN, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit |
Daniel E. Wherry, U. S. Atty., Lincoln, Neb., and Thomas D. Thalken, Asst. U. S. Atty., Omaha, Neb., for respondent.
Charles I. Scudder, Omaha, Neb., for petitioner.
Before GIBSON, Chief Judge, LAY and HENLEY, Circuit Judges.
This is an appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 from a denial by the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska, the Honorable Robert V. Denney presiding, of Jerry A. Belvin's petition to set aside his guilty plea. The only issue raised on appeal is the trial court's failure to hold an evidentiary hearing on petitioner's mental competency.
On December 14, 1973, a grand jury returned an indictment against the petitioner charging him with kidnapping under 18 U.S.C. § 1201(a), interstate transportation of a stolen motor vehicle under 18 U.S.C. § 2312, and interstate transportation and use of a firearm by a felon under 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(a) and 924(a) and (c).
After Belvin entered a plea of not guilty to all charges, his counsel sought a competency examination pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4244 because at that time petitioner claimed that he had amnesia and could not remember the events leading to his arrest and indictment. The trial court committed Belvin to the Springfield Medical Center for purposes of a competency examination. Thereafter Judge Denney received an opinion from the staff of the medical center which concluded that the petitioner "is presently a personality problem but is free of mental disease or defect and we consider him competent to return to court to stand trial." Petitioner was returned to the district court and upon motion of his counsel was allowed an independent psychiatric examination. At a subsequent hearing counsel announced,
I have had Belvin examined by someone whom I feel to be a competent psychiatrist and also tests run by some competent neurologists here in Omaha. . . . (I)f they were called, they would have to say such condition (amnesia) does not exist.
Both prior to and after this comment, the court inquired if Belvin understood the nature of the proceedings and was satisfied with the performance of his attorney. At all times, petitioner responded in the affirmative.
On this basis Judge Denney accepted the withdrawal of petitioner's plea of not...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
U.S. v. Jones
...985, 99 S.Ct. 1801, 60 L.Ed.2d 248 (1979); Durham v. Wyrick, 545 F.2d 41, 44 (8th Cir.1976) (per curiam ); Belvin v. United States, 538 F.2d 1335, 1336 (8th Cir.1976) (per curiam ), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1100, 97 S.Ct. 1123, 51 L.Ed.2d 549 (1977); United States v. Dworshak, 514 F.2d 716, 7......
-
U.S. v. Peeler, 83-1940
...by the district court which raises a "bona fide question or reasonable doubt" as to his or her competence. Belvin v. United States, 538 F.2d 1335, 1336 (8th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1100, 97 S.Ct. 1123, 51 L.Ed.2d 549 Peeler first argues that he was mentally incompetent when he ple......
-
U.S. v. Belvin
...hearing at trial to determine his competency. This court affirmed the district court's denial of Belvin's motion, Belvin v. United States, 538 F.2d 1335, 1336 (8th Cir. 1976), stating that we found no error in the aforementioned plea proceedings and that "(u)nder the circumstances there is ......